Juan Brignardello Vela
Juan Brignardello, asesor de seguros, se especializa en brindar asesoramiento y gestión comercial en el ámbito de seguros y reclamaciones por siniestros para destacadas empresas en el mercado peruano e internacional.
The recent approval of lecanemab, a drug designed to slow the decline of early-stage Alzheimer's disease, has ignited a complex discussion within the UK healthcare system. While the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has greenlit the treatment, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has declared that it will not be made available on the National Health Service (NHS), citing that the benefits do not justify the steep costs associated with the drug. Lecanemab, which marks a significant milestone as the first dementia treatment to gain regulatory approval in over two decades, has been shown in clinical trials to potentially delay the progression of Alzheimer's by four to six months. This is achieved by targeting beta-amyloid proteins known to form disruptive plaques in the brains of those suffering from this common form of dementia. As dementia continues to be the leading cause of death in the UK, the introduction of a new treatment brings hope but also raises critical questions about accessibility and affordability. NICE's decision underscores the delicate balance between innovation in healthcare and the financial constraints of the NHS. The drug is estimated to cost over £20,000 annually in the US, and additional infusion costs—reported to be around £500 per visit—further complicate matters. Given that patients must receive these treatments every two weeks for 18 months, the cumulative financial burden presents a formidable challenge for the NHS. Adding to the complexity, only a small fraction—approximately 2%—of Alzheimer's patients in the UK currently have access to the diagnostic tools necessary for determining eligibility for lecanemab, such as PET scans or lumbar punctures. This leaves many individuals without the opportunity to benefit from what could be a pioneering treatment. Hilary Evans-Newton, the chief executive of Alzheimer's Research UK, expressed her disappointment with NICE's decision, emphasizing that this move effectively restricts access to those who can afford to pay privately. She called for renewed negotiations between NICE, the drug's manufacturer Eisai, and the NHS, urging swift action from health officials to find a viable path forward. Professor Jonathan Benger, NICE's chief medical officer, noted that while the approval is a milestone, the associated costs present a significant obstacle for the NHS. The reality is that the provision of such treatments requires not only the drug itself but also a well-resourced healthcare framework capable of supporting its administration and monitoring. The implications of this decision extend beyond lecanemab. Daniel Thomas, head of policy at Alzheimer's Research, cautioned that other forthcoming treatments, like donanemab from Eli Lilly, may encounter similar hurdles regarding access and affordability, thereby heightening concerns for patients and families facing the harsh realities of Alzheimer's disease. In a hopeful note, Professor Sir Stephen Powis of NHS England indicated that the health service is anticipating the potential approval of 27 additional drugs currently in advanced clinical trials by 2030. This highlights a future filled with possibilities, contingent upon the NHS's capacity to adapt and embrace these new therapies. While the regulatory approval of lecanemab is a promising development in the fight against Alzheimer's, the disconnect between regulatory success and practical availability within the NHS raises significant concerns. As stakeholders navigate these challenges, the focus must remain on ensuring that patients receive the care they need without the burden of prohibitive costs. The journey towards equitable access to groundbreaking treatments is far from over, and the voices of those affected by Alzheimer's will remain vital in shaping the path forward.