GPs in England Take a Stand: Work-to-Rule Action Threatens NHS Patient Care and Access

GPs in England Take a Stand: Work-to-Rule Action Threatens NHS Patient Care and Access

GPs in England begin work-to-rule due to funding disputes, risking patient access and safety in an already strained NHS system.

Juan Brignardello, asesor de seguros

Juan Brignardello Vela

Juan Brignardello, asesor de seguros, se especializa en brindar asesoramiento y gestión comercial en el ámbito de seguros y reclamaciones por siniestros para destacadas empresas en el mercado peruano e internacional.

Juan Brignardello, asesor de seguros, y Vargas Llosa, premio Nobel Juan Brignardello, asesor de seguros, en celebración de Alianza Lima Juan Brignardello, asesor de seguros, Central Hidro Eléctrica Juan Brignardello, asesor de seguros, Central Hidro
Health 18.08.2024

As GPs across England embark on a work-to-rule action in response to escalating tensions with the government over inadequate funding, the implications of this move loom large for both healthcare providers and the patients they serve. While many GPs assert that this decision is a necessary step to safeguard their ability to provide care, the repercussions could ripple throughout the National Health Service, potentially exacerbating an already strained system. The current work-to-rule initiative has seen surgeries implementing measures such as capping daily patient consultations to a mere 25. This drastic reduction in patient appointments could lead to a staggering one-third decrease in availability, posing significant challenges for patients who are already grappling with long wait times and difficulty accessing care. The situation raises urgent questions about patient safety and the quality of care that can be realistically provided under such constraints. Dr. Tom Gorman, a GP from Newcastle and one of the practitioners involved, expresses a profound sense of urgency about the state of the system. After eight years in the field, he describes the current landscape as being at a "breaking point." He emphasizes the need for action to stem the tide of overwhelming demand that is undermining the capacity to meet patient needs. "We don't want to take action," he stresses, "but we're being forced to protect our patients and staff." Data from the British Social Attitudes Survey underscores the severity of the problem, revealing that public satisfaction with general practice is at an all-time low. With one in three individuals reporting dissatisfaction with appointment wait times and one in five expressing poor experiences when trying to contact their GP, it is no wonder that concerns about patient safety are mounting. Particularly vulnerable groups, such as younger adults and those living in impoverished areas, are disproportionately affected, further widening the gap in healthcare access. The work-to-rule action, while not a traditional strike, reflects a growing discontent within the GP community, which operates as independent businesses. The British Medical Association (BMA) has provided a framework for GPs to adopt various measures, such as limiting patient numbers, refusing non-essential tasks, and resisting data-sharing requests. These steps are intended to highlight the excessive burden placed on GPs and enable them to focus more effectively on the core responsibilities of their roles. However, the implications of these actions are multifaceted. While Dr. Samira Masoud, a GP in Kent, asserts that limiting patient numbers could improve both GP and patient experiences, the resulting constraints may inadvertently drive more individuals to Accident & Emergency departments, exacerbating pressures within the wider healthcare system. NHS England has expressed concern that the work-to-rule could prolong hospital discharges and hinder patient care pathways, ultimately jeopardizing patient health outcomes. Compounding these challenges is a recruitment and retention crisis within the GP workforce. Despite promises from previous governments to bolster the number of practicing GPs, the reality on the ground is stark: the number of patients per GP continues to rise, and younger doctors—who represent the future of general practice—are increasingly opting to leave the profession due to unsustainable workloads. Dr. Becks Fisher from the Nuffield Trust argues that a mere increase in funding is insufficient to rectify the foundational issues plaguing general practice. "Funding has lagged behind demand and inflation for years," she notes, suggesting that sustainable solutions will require long-term commitments rather than quick fixes. As the current situation unfolds, the extent to which GPs will participate in this work-to-rule remains uncertain. Although initial involvement has been moderate, the BMA anticipates a gradual escalation of pressure as more practitioners become engaged. The outcome of this dispute is critical, not only for the future of general practice but also for the millions of patients who depend on it. With the government promising additional funding and urging GPs to reconsider their actions, the hope is that a resolution can be reached that addresses the underlying issues of funding, staffing, and patient care. Until then, the question remains: is this work-to-rule a necessary stand for GPs, or a perilous step that may deepen the crisis facing the NHS? The answer may very well shape the future of healthcare in the UK.

View All The Latest In the world