Juan Brignardello Vela
Juan Brignardello, asesor de seguros, se especializa en brindar asesoramiento y gestión comercial en el ámbito de seguros y reclamaciones por siniestros para destacadas empresas en el mercado peruano e internacional.
A recent poll indicates a significant shift in public sentiment in the United Kingdom regarding the approach to tackling the obesity crisis. A survey conducted by Ipsos for the Health Foundation thinktank reveals that 58% of respondents are in favor of imposing a new tax on companies that produce highly processed and sugary food items. This growing appetite for intervention comes as the nation grapples with an escalating obesity epidemic, which is costing the UK economy approximately £98 billion annually. The proposed tax, reminiscent of the sugar tax introduced in 2018, aims not only to discourage the production of unhealthy food but also to generate revenue that could be redirected towards purchasing fresh fruits and vegetables for families in need. This dual approach would not only address the issues of obesity but also promote healthier eating habits among lower-income households. The survey results show that support for taxing sugary and salty products is robust, with only 19% opposed to the idea. When it comes to ultra-processed foods—such as mass-produced bread, biscuits, and deli meats—53% of respondents also support a tax. This indicates a growing awareness of the health implications associated with such foods, including increased risks of heart disease, cancer, and mental health issues. Public health experts are urging the government to take these findings seriously. Adam Briggs from the Health Foundation emphasized the necessity for decisive action, stating, "The public are basically saying: it's time for tough action." He believes that legislation should begin with taxing items like confectionery and sugary breakfast cereals before expanding to ready meals and pizzas, which also contribute to high salt intake. Despite some resistance from food industry representatives, who argue that the focus should be on promoting healthier product development rather than imposing taxes, the consensus among health advocates is clear. They highlight that previous measures, such as the soft drinks industry levy, have driven manufacturers to reformulate their products to avoid additional costs, thereby benefiting public health. Concerns about the impact of ultra-processed foods are echoed by experts like Prof. Carlos Monteiro, who advocates for tobacco-style warnings on such products and believes that they should be taxed due to their potential dangers. However, there is also caution about a blanket tax on all ultra-processed foods. Dr. Chris van Tulleken suggests a more nuanced approach, advocating for the regulation of specific products rather than an overarching tax on the entire category. He warns that while taxing corporations may be necessary, it should be done thoughtfully to avoid exacerbating health inequalities. As the conversation around health and nutrition continues to evolve, the findings from this poll may serve as a catalyst for urgent policy discussions. With obesity presenting a significant burden on the NHS and the broader economy, the call for a new tax on junk and ultra-processed food manufacturers reflects a clear demand for accountability and action in the fight against poor diet and its consequences.