Prosecutor Jack Smith requests dismissal of the case against Trump following his electoral victory.

Special prosecutor Jack Smith requested on Monday the dismissal of the case against Donald Trump related to the Capitol riot, an event that marked one of the darkest chapters in American politics. This legal move comes in a unique context, as Trump prepares to assume the presidency again after winning the elections on November 5. Smith's decision, based on the internal policies of the Department of Justice, raises questions about the future of criminal justice in the United States and the treatment of former presidents.

In the court document submitted, Smith argues that current regulations prevent criminal charges from being pursued against a sitting president. This principle has led to the conclusion that any charges must be dismissed before the accused formally assumes office. Judge Tanya Chutkan, who oversees the case, granted a pause in the proceedings on November 8, suggesting that the judicial system is carefully weighing the impact of the election results on the case.

The context of the presidential campaign has added a layer of complexity to the matter. Trump has made it clear that on his first day in office, he intends to fire Smith and close the cases against him, which he claims are part of a "political witch hunt." This assertion has resonated among his supporters and has sparked a broader debate about the politicization of the judicial system in the United States.

The Capitol riot on January 6, 2021, was a manifestation of political discontent fueled by unfounded claims of electoral fraud by Trump. Prosecutors have argued that Trump played a crucial role in inciting violence, encouraging his supporters to believe that then-Vice President Mike Pence could overturn the election results. However, with the recent electoral victory, Trump's judicial landscape appears to be changing dramatically.

Despite the charges against him, the recent electoral victory offers Trump a respite in legal terms. In fact, in May, Trump became the first former president of the United States to be convicted in a criminal case related to irregular payments to actress Stormy Daniels. However, the judge has postponed his sentencing, creating a temporary void that could benefit the elected president in his attempt to avoid legal punishment.

Special prosecutor Smith's stance to dismiss the case has generated mixed reactions among legal experts and the public. Some argue that this approach could set a dangerous precedent, allowing future presidents to evade accountability for their actions while in office. Others maintain that the decision aligns with the expectation of due process, particularly given the context in which Trump has been reelected.

Judge Chutkan has the responsibility to decide whether to accept Smith's request. This process could be prolonged and is likely to attract intense media and public scrutiny. As the case progresses, the question arises as to what justice truly means in a democracy and whether political leaders should be treated differently from other citizens.

The situation also sheds light on the political polarization that has characterized the United States in recent years. The perception that the judicial system is being manipulated by political interests has grown among Trump's base, further fueling divisions in an already fractured society. As events unfold, the future of the judicial system and its ability to act impartially in high-profile cases will remain a topic of debate.

Smith's decision to request the dismissal of the case against Trump is just one piece in the larger puzzle of American politics. With Trump returning to the White House and a series of pending legal challenges, the country finds itself at a crossroads that could define the relationship between politics and justice in the coming decades. The evolution of this case, as well as the responses from the public and analysts, will be crucial for understanding how this new chapter in American political history will unfold.