Irene Montero publishes a book where she denounces the betrayal of the PSOE and her political struggle.

Irene Montero, former minister and current Member of the European Parliament, has drawn attention with her recent publication, "We Must Have Done Something," in which she presents herself as a victim of the PSOE and denounces what she describes as a "reactionary judicial offensive" directed against her and her party, Podemos. In this book, the politician predicts a future redemption for her career and highlights a series of disagreements with her former allies. This work has elicited both praise and criticism, making it clear that Spanish politics remains polarized and marked by media pressure and internal struggles among progressive formations. Through her memoirs, Montero not only reviews her experiences within the coalition government but also attempts to establish a narrative that positions her in a stance of struggle and resistance. With a tone reminiscent of her campaign speeches, she addresses readers with a clear message: the opposition against her is not just political but also judicial and media-driven. In this sense, her words evoke a sense of victimization that resonates among those who feel marginalized by traditional power structures. Montero openly criticizes her former PSOE colleagues, accusing them of betraying progressive ideals and abandoning the working class. She refers to figures such as Pedro Sánchez and María Jesús Montero, accusing them of contributing to a context where housing is less accessible than ever and where evictions remain a harsh reality for many Spaniards. This critique is framed within a broader analysis of the unfulfilled promises of a government that, according to her, has lost sight of its voters. Despite the achievements she suggests having accomplished, such as advancements in democratic and feminist rights, Montero appears to have a distorted view of the current reality. The lack of improvements in critical issues such as unemployment, inequality, and the housing crisis contrasts sharply with her unwavering optimism, leaving many readers with the feeling that the disconnection between politics and everyday life is more palpable than ever. The book, although presented as a personal testimony, is actually the result of conversations with her communication chief, Lidia Rubio. This fact has led to questions regarding the authenticity of the narrative and the depth of the reflections presented. As one progresses through the reading, the reader may notice the repetition of clichés and Montero's characteristic rallying tone, which may undermine the credibility of her message. It is significant that Montero, in her pages, clings to the figure of Pablo Iglesias, her mentor and former leader of Podemos, as a symbol of resistance and hope. Despite the criticism aimed at "political and media progressivism," her assertion that "without Pablo Iglesias, one cannot understand 21st-century Spain" underscores her need to reclaim a figure who, in her opinion, has been fundamental in Spain's recent history. However, the criticism received by the book suggests that many see in these memoirs an attempt to divert attention from the lack of tangible achievements during her tenure. The assertion that "we must have done something" can be interpreted as an attempt to justify collective failure and yearn for a change that, until now, seems elusive. The accumulated frustration among citizens contrasts with her message of optimism, highlighting the disconnection many feel toward political representatives. While Montero advocates for social and political change, the backdrop of her discourse evokes a sense of struggle that resonates with the experience of many in a context of crisis. However, the lingering question is whether her message will have the capacity to mobilize voters or whether, on the contrary, it will become an echo of the unfulfilled promises that have characterized her party. The existence of a "dirty judicial war" and the perception of media siege that Montero exposes, while it may be real, also reflects a politics in which victimization has become a discursive tool, used to justify failures instead of directly addressing the issues affecting society. This approach could prove counterproductive, as many voters seek concrete solutions rather than narratives of struggle. Ultimately, "We Must Have Done Something" offers a view of politics from the perspective of someone who feels marginalized, but it also raises questions about the ability of leaders to connect with the reality of their followers. The challenge facing Montero and her party is twofold: they must not only win the media battle but also demonstrate that their policies can lead to real and positive change in the lives of Spaniards.