Juan Brignardello Vela
Juan Brignardello, asesor de seguros, se especializa en brindar asesoramiento y gestión comercial en el ámbito de seguros y reclamaciones por siniestros para destacadas empresas en el mercado peruano e internacional.
When it comes to end-of-life care, a "do not resuscitate" (D.N.R.) order stands as a crucial tool for individuals seeking to assert their medical preferences. This directive instructs healthcare professionals not to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or other associated resuscitation methods if a patient's heart stops. While the intention behind a D.N.R. is to ensure that one's wishes are respected, there are essential factors to consider to enhance the likelihood that these wishes are honored. A D.N.R. order prohibits not only CPR but also a range of interventions such as electrical shocks, intubation, ventilation, and certain medications. However, despite its clarity, studies indicate that medical personnel can, at times, override these orders. Some healthcare providers may misinterpret a D.N.R. as a blanket directive against all forms of medical treatment, which can lead to misunderstandings about a patient’s desires for care beyond resuscitation. Understanding the rationale behind a D.N.R. is particularly vital for those considering this option. Many individuals, especially older adults with serious health conditions, choose to forgo resuscitation due to the potential harms associated with CPR. According to Mathew Pauley, a bioethicist within the Kaiser Permanente system, the risks of CPR can significantly overshadow its potential benefits, especially in cases where the likelihood of survival is low. The physical toll of resuscitation efforts may include broken bones, punctured lungs, and even burns, not to mention the possibility of lasting cognitive impairments from oxygen deprivation. Research has revealed that many D.N.R. patients cite their current quality of life as a primary reason for their decision. Many of these individuals express a desire to avoid additional suffering or to spare their families from the emotional and financial burdens that could arise from aggressive medical interventions. Moreover, there is often a profound wish to allow natural death when the time comes, aligning with personal values about dignity in dying. To ensure that a D.N.R. order is respected, open communication with healthcare providers is crucial. Engaging in conversations with your doctor about your healthcare priorities, logic, and expectations can help set the stage for making informed decisions. Dr. Max Vergo, a palliative care specialist with Dartmouth Health, emphasizes the importance of starting this dialogue with a clinician who is familiar with your health status. It's also advisable for patients to document their wishes clearly and, if possible, select a specific D.N.R. form provided by your healthcare system. Medicare covers advance care planning costs, which means that discussing these preferences during annual checkups is not only encouraged but also financially supported. Ultimately, a D.N.R. order can serve as an empowering instrument for individuals navigating the complexities of end-of-life care. By taking proactive steps to communicate and document their wishes, patients can increase the likelihood that their intentions are honored, ensuring that their dignity and values remain at the forefront of their healthcare decisions.