Public Ministry archives investigation against Boluarte for alleged genocide.

The decision of the Public Ministry to archive the investigation against President Dina Boluarte for the alleged crime of genocide has sparked a wide debate in the political and social spheres of the country. The announcement was made by the head of the Ministerial Cabinet, Gustavo Adrianzén, who used his official account on the social network X to share the resolution that absolves the president from the serious accusations related to the deaths that occurred during the protests at the end of 2022 and the beginning of 2023. The document issued by the prosecutor's office concludes that there are not enough merits to file a constitutional complaint against Boluarte or her former ministers. This news has been received with relief by the president's political allies, particularly by her lawyer, Joseph Campos, who emphasized that the genocide charge was unfounded and had negatively impacted both the president's image and that of the country internationally. Campos argued that the accusation of genocide was never substantiated and described the implications of the investigation, which lasted more than a year and a half, as "madness." The decision to archive the case, although welcomed, was considered overdue by some, who highlighted that the reputational damage had already been done. This context underscores the need for effective crisis management in government communication. The initial investigation also contemplated other crimes such as homicide, bodily harm, and crimes against humanity, indicating the seriousness of the accusations. However, the prosecutor's resolution has limited the focus to the issue of genocide, leaving open the possibility of continuing to investigate the use of force by authorities during social mobilizations. Campos stressed that the use of weapons by the Armed Forces and the National Police must be analyzed, which could open the door to debates on protest control strategies in a country with a history of social tensions. The impact of this decision is not limited to the judicial realm but also has significant political implications. The opposition, which at one point demanded Boluarte's resignation and called for political trials against her, will need to rethink its strategy following this outcome. The political situation in Peru is volatile, and the shelving of the investigation could reshape alliances and tensions in Congress, where the president was already facing criticism and scrutiny regarding her administration. On the other hand, Dina Boluarte's recent message to the nation becomes a crucial point for understanding how the president will use this resolution to her advantage. Expectations regarding the response of the congress members to her speech are high, and many wonder if this news will influence the perception of her leadership. The president's ability to translate this judicial support into political backing will be essential for her continued stay in power. From the social perspective, reactions to the Public Ministry's decision are diverse. Some sectors see the archiving of the investigation as a victory for political stability, while others believe that the lack of accountability in the use of force by authorities could set a bad precedent. Public opinion polarization is intensifying, and it is clear that the demand for justice remains strong among many citizens who seek clear answers regarding the deaths that occurred during the protests. Ultimately, the Public Ministry's decision regarding Dina Boluarte is another chapter in the complex political history of recent Peru. This situation invites reflection on the government's responsibilities towards its citizens and on how crises are managed in a democratic context. The fight for justice and the recognition of human rights continues to be a recurring theme that must be addressed with seriousness and commitment. This outcome not only affects Boluarte but also impacts the political and social dynamics of the country. The international community remains vigilant, and it is expected that the government will take proactive measures to avoid future conflicts and strengthen the rule of law. Transparency and accountability will be key to restoring the population's trust in its institutions and leaders.