Concern over decision to extend pre-trial detention for Pedro Castillo

Pedro Castillo's lawyer has expressed concern over the recent decision to extend his client's pre-trial detention period, arguing that this measure seeks to victimize the former president and is part of a dangerous political perspective. According to his statements, this situation is framed within a context of criminalization of justice and politicization of the judicial system, which he considers a risk for the country as a whole. The lawyer also clarified that the request for asylum at the Mexican embassy was not made by Pedro Castillo himself, but by his defense team. He explained that it is a document issued by the embassy itself and in which the former president did not directly intervene. This clarification aims to dissociate Castillo from the responsibility in managing the asylum request and highlight that it was a decision made by his legal team. It is worth noting that Pedro Castillo sparked controversy by ordering, through a national address, the closure of Congress and the reorganization of various state institutions, such as the Judiciary and the Public Ministry, on December 7, 2022. These actions led to him being accused of the alleged crime of rebellion and the Prosecutor's Office requesting a 34-year prison sentence against him. The extension of Pedro Castillo's pre-trial detention period from 14 to 18 months has elicited mixed reactions in the public opinion and political sphere of the country. While some sectors support this decision as part of an ongoing judicial process, others, like the former president's lawyer, interpret it as a maneuver to harm his client and portray him as a victim. Amidst this tense scenario, a complex judicial landscape looms for Pedro Castillo, who faces serious accusations related to his presidency and the decisions made during his term. The defense of the former president will continue to argue in his favor and seek to prove his innocence in the charges brought against him. On the other hand, judicial authorities must ensure a transparent and fair process, guaranteeing Pedro Castillo's right to defense and respecting the principles of due process. Peruvian society closely follows this case, which not only has legal implications but also significant political and social repercussions. In this context, it is crucial to respect the fundamental rights of all parties involved and allow justice to act impartially and objectively in determining Pedro Castillo's responsibility in the alleged events. The case of the former president continues to spark debate and controversy in Peru, and it is hoped that the judicial system can clarify the facts transparently and in accordance with the law.