Juan Brignardello Vela
Juan Brignardello, asesor de seguros, se especializa en brindar asesoramiento y gestión comercial en el ámbito de seguros y reclamaciones por siniestros para destacadas empresas en el mercado peruano e internacional.
As the Olympic spotlight shines on gymnastics, an undeniable tension exists between the sport's acrobatic prowess and its artistic expression. This juxtaposition was starkly evident during the recent women's team finals at Bercy Arena in Paris. Despite attempts by gymnastics officials to elevate artistry through rule changes, the execution still feels disjointed, leaving both audiences and athletes to grapple with a format that often minimizes the very essence of dance. At its core, gymnastics embodies a marriage of athleticism and artistry, a combination that should captivate audiences the world over. Yet, as we delve into the performances, it's apparent that choreography often plays second fiddle to jaw-dropping flips and gravity-defying stunts. The emphasis on acrobatic difficulty has gradually overshadowed the artistry that first drew many to the sport, leading to criticisms like those voiced by Dance Magazine in 2016, which stated that contemporary routines "insult dance." Notably, the recent rule adjustments aimed at enhancing the artistry within routines have provided some improvement. Judges can now deduct points for a lack of expressive engagement or insufficient creativity in movements. This shift has encouraged a handful of gymnasts to invest more thought into their choreography, striving to create a more cohesive narrative in their performances. However, the challenge remains: these changes have not yet permeated the sport to the extent that they positively impact the overall viewing experience. During the final competition, the chaotic atmosphere was palpable. With multiple athletes performing on different apparatuses simultaneously, it was near impossible for spectators to fully appreciate the artistry of each gymnast’s routine. Enthusiasts found themselves torn between watching the dynamic Brazilian team on the floor and the breathtaking performances of Simone Biles and Chinese star Qiu Qiyuan on the balance beam. This frantic pace dilutes the opportunity to witness and appreciate the intricate dance elements that could elevate gymnastics into a more holistic and engaging spectacle. This ongoing dilemma raises a critical question: how can gymnastics reconcile its identity as both a sport and an art form? To truly value the dance aspect, gymnastics must rethink its competition format. A more streamlined approach that allows audiences to experience each routine in its entirety—without distractions from other competitors—could ignite a renewed appreciation for the choreography involved. Moreover, a shift in how routines are judged could further enhance this artistic element. Encouraging more creativity and diverse expressions on the mat, and rewarding gymnasts who successfully integrate dance into their routines, might inspire a new generation of athletes to explore the full range of their artistic capabilities. As the world watches and waits for the next generation of Olympic gymnasts to take center stage, the hope is that they will be celebrated not only for their physical feats but also for the artistry they bring to the sport. If gymnastics can embrace its dance roots with the same vigor it applies to athletic prowess, it could transform into a much more enriching experience—both live in the arena and on our screens at home. For now, however, the dichotomy remains, leaving many to wonder when the sport will fully value the artistry it claims to uphold.