Alito Moreno faces an internal crisis in the PRI while trying to consolidate his power.

In the current political landscape of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), Alejandro Moreno, better known as “Alito,” has taken center stage in a way that has generated both support and rejection within his own organization. The recent controversy surrounding his potential reelection as party president has sparked a series of reactions among former presidents and prominent figures of the PRI, who have expressed their disagreement, with some even threatening to resign. However, beyond the emotional statements, Alito's strategy seems to be bearing fruit that could secure him almost absolute control over the party. Moreno has woven a political web in which he has involved his detractors in a way that they seem to be playing against themselves. His reforms to the PRI's statutes are not only a tool for legitimizing himself but also the first step towards an internal purge aimed at eliminating those who, in his view, are responsible for the party's debacle. Thus, the Campeche native has assumed the role of savior of PRIism, in an attempt to revive what many consider an extinct party. Former PRI presidents, such as Dulce María Sauri, Francisco Labastida, and Manlio Fabio Beltrones, have been the target of criticism from Alito. The latter has not hesitated to remind them of their failures and the scandals that have marked their careers, such as the infamous Pemexgate and the electoral losses of 2000. Through a discourse that mixes arrogance and victimization, Alito has presented these leaders as remnants of a past that, according to him, must be eradicated. As the internal climate heats up, the threats of resignation from important figures within the PRI have fallen on deaf ears. Alito has so far demonstrated that he is not easily intimidated; in fact, he seems to find in these resignations the perfect justification to carry out his internal cleansing plan. The possibility of weakening his opponents gives him considerable maneuvering room and simultaneously reinforces his narrative of being the only one capable of rescuing the party. The moment becomes even more intriguing when analyzing how Alito has directed the discourse surrounding his reforms. Instead of opening a constructive dialogue with dissenting voices, he has chosen to attack them directly, labeling his detractors as responsible for a past that has led the PRI to lose power. This aggressive approach could be risky, but it is also a calculated move to consolidate his leadership. Amid this whirlwind, the role of social media and the press cannot be underestimated. Attacks and threats have gone viral, allowing Alito's narrative to reach a broader audience. However, this exposure also carries risks; public opinion, especially that of party members, could turn against him if scandals continue to accumulate. Meanwhile, Alito's figure stands on shaky ground. Although he currently seems to be winning, his tactics could backfire if he fails to maintain the loyalty of his base. The perception of abuse of power and the elimination of critical voices could generate a boomerang effect that further fractures the PRI. On the other hand, the party's political history is marked by internal struggles and betrayals, making the current situation not entirely surprising. Recent history has shown that attempts to consolidate absolute power often end in divisions and discontent. Only time will tell if Alito's strategy will result in a revitalization of the party or its eventual decline. Finally, in this context, the situation of other parties in Mexico also resonates, where internal movements and struggles for control are recurrent. Mexican politics is undergoing a transformation, and the PRI, with its old glories and new challenges, finds itself at a crossroads that will test its ability to adapt. Thus, while Alito Moreno positions himself as the captain of the PRI ship, the turbulent waters of national politics promise more surprises. The question many are asking is whether this course will lead him to a safe harbor or, conversely, to an inevitable shipwreck.