Historical Dramas Redefine Monarchs: From Queen Victoria's Detachment to Poldark's Justice

The recent adaptations of historical figures in television and film have reignited discussions about how the past is portrayed, particularly concerning issues of class conflict and the impact of monarchy on society. Two prominent examples are the series *Victoria* (2016-2019) and *Poldark* (2015), each offering a distinct narrative lens on the lives of their titular characters and the broader societal implications in 19th-century Britain. *Victoria* presents a dramatized account of Queen Victoria's early reign, emphasizing her concern for her subjects, including those suffering from the Great Hunger in Ireland. In the episode "Faith, Hope & Charity," Victoria's reaction to the famine showcases her internal struggle as she grapples with the moral implications of her monarchy's detachment from the plight of the Irish people. While the series attempts to portray her as sympathetic, historical evidence suggests otherwise. Historian Christine Kinealy argues that Victoria’s actions did not reflect genuine compassion, pointing out her limited involvement in alleviating the suffering caused by the famine. The portrayal of Victoria's concern contrasts sharply with the reality of British policies at the time, which prioritized economic interests over humanitarian aid, leading to catastrophic outcomes for the Irish populace. This fictional retelling raises questions about the monarchy's historical image and its attempts at rebranding in response to public sentiment. David Cannadine's research highlights how the monarchy faced hostility in the early 19th century, prompting efforts to reshape their public perception into that of a unifying symbol. This rebranding was essential as Britain transitioned into a more urban and industrial society, and the monarchy sought to maintain its relevance amid rising class tensions. In stark contrast to *Victoria*, *Poldark* offers a narrative steeped in class struggle and social justice. The titular character, Ross Poldark, emerges as an Enlightenment figure who advocates for the underprivileged and challenges the aristocracy. His disdain for his own class reflects a deeper critique of societal structures that perpetuate inequality. Unlike Victoria, who symbolizes the monarchy's detachment, Poldark is portrayed as actively engaging with the local community, working to establish a cooperative economy and support the disenfranchised. The differing approaches of these series invite reflection on the narratives that mainstream media choose to elevate. While *Victoria* aligns with a romanticized view of monarchy, emphasizing personal virtue and benevolence, *Poldark* grapples with the harsh realities of class conflict and the moral responsibility of those in power. This tension between the two narratives reveals a broader cultural inclination towards glorifying monarchy while simultaneously sidelining the complexities of class struggles and historical injustices. The discussions sparked by these series underline the importance of critical engagement with historical narratives. By presenting a more nuanced view of the past, audiences can better understand the intricacies of class conflict and the legacies of power that continue to shape contemporary society. The portrayal of Queen Victoria as a caring monarch may resonate with some viewers, but it risks overshadowing the very real suffering experienced by marginalized communities during her reign. Conversely, *Poldark* stands as a reminder of the ongoing struggle for social justice and the importance of acknowledging all voices in the historical narrative. As society continues to grapple with its historical legacy, the roles of media portrayals in shaping public understanding cannot be underestimated. The challenge remains to present a balanced view that encompasses both the triumphs and the tribulations of the past, fostering a more informed and empathetic collective memory.