The sinking of the Russian ship 'Ursa Major' generates tensions and theories in the Mediterranean.

The sinking of the Russian ship 'Ursa Major' in Mediterranean waters has sparked a series of speculations and accusations regarding the circumstances of its sinking. The company Oboronlogistics, owner of the ship and linked to the Russian Ministry of Defense, has described the incident as a "planned terrorist attack." This statement has intensified geopolitical tensions in the region, where military presence and strategic interests are particularly sensitive.

The 'Ursa Major' sank after suffering up to three explosions in its engine rooms, leading to the flooding of several compartments. Of the 16 crew members on board, 14 were successfully rescued and taken to the port of Cartagena, on the Murcian coast of Spain. However, two crew members are still missing, a fact that adds a tragic nuance to this already unsettling event.

Russian authorities have responded to the sinking by opening a criminal case investigating violations of safety regulations in maritime transport operations. The Western Interregional Directorate of the Investigative Committee of Russia has announced that investigative actions are being organized in collaboration with the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs to clarify all facts related to the incident.

The mystery surrounding the sinking of the 'Ursa Major' has given rise to various theories. Some media outlets, such as The Sun, suggest that the ship may have been involved in a "secret mission." This theory is based on the nature of the cargo it was carrying, which, according to The Daily Mail, could have consisted of military equipment destined for Syria. Ukrainian military intelligence has even hinted that the ship was on its way to retrieve Russian military material from the Arab country following the fall of Bashar al-Assad's regime.

However, other reports indicate a different version. According to the Murcian newspaper La Verdad, the captain of the 'Ursa Major' reportedly stated that the containers on board were empty at the time of the accident. This information raises doubts about the nature of the cargo and the true purpose of the voyage, suggesting that the ship was in transit between St. Petersburg and Vladivostok, with an expected arrival date in January.

The fact that the ship sank in a strategic area of the Mediterranean, between Spain and Algeria, also adds a layer of complexity to the incident. This area has witnessed various conflicts and international tensions, which could have influenced the circumstances of the sinking. The possibility that the 'Ursa Major' was involved in activities related to the conflict in Syria, or in the withdrawal of Russian weaponry, has led many to question the true intentions behind its journey.

The use of the term "terrorist" by Russian authorities to describe the incident can be interpreted as an attempt to divert international attention and maintain the narrative that Russia is a victim of external attacks. This is particularly relevant in the context of the tense relations between Russia and the West, where every incident is scrutinized intensely.

As investigations are underway, uncertainty about the fate of the two missing crew members and the truth behind the explosions persists. The international community will be closely monitoring developments in the investigation, which could reveal more details about an event that appears to be laden with political and military implications.

Ultimately, the sinking of the 'Ursa Major' not only raises questions about maritime transport safety but also reflects the complexities of a world where geopolitical interests often intertwine with human tragedy. As the mystery continues, speculation and theories about what really happened on that fateful night in the Mediterranean are likely to persist.