Trump stirs controversy by linking crime to the "bad genes" of immigrants.

In a recent interview with radio host Hugh Hewitt, former President Donald Trump made a controversial statement regarding undocumented immigrants, suggesting that violence and crime among these individuals are due to what he refers to as "bad genes." This comment, which adds to a pattern of derogatory rhetoric towards immigrants, has generated considerable outrage and criticism both politically and socially.

During the conversation, Trump criticized Vice President Kamala Harris for her handling of border security, accusing her of allowing dangerous individuals to enter the country. According to Trump, of the more than 425,000 undocumented individuals who have entered the United States, a significant number are criminals. However, it is important to note that his claims are based on data that dates back to years before the current administration, raising serious doubts about the truthfulness and context of his statements.

Trump's statement about "bad genes" reflects a broader trend in his discourse, which he has used throughout his political career to dehumanize and stigmatize immigrants. This type of rhetoric, which evokes racial and biological notions to argue about criminality, is not only alarming but also resonates with historical ideologies that have been disapproved of for their racist and xenophobic implications.

Critics, including members of the Democratic Party itself, have denounced these assertions as dangerous and divisive. Vice President Harris has vehemently responded to such comments, emphasizing how Trump has used his platform to incite hate and racism as a means to gain political advantage. Harris has pointed out that this type of language is not only offensive but also has destructive potential for the social cohesion of the nation.

Trump is no stranger to controversy over his comments on immigration. Since he launched his presidential campaign in 2015, he has faced criticism for his use of language that many consider racist and derogatory. In previous campaigns, he had already hinted that certain groups of immigrants were responsible for social problems, a narrative that has been widely debated and refuted by studies and data indicating that immigrants, in general, are not more likely to commit crimes than native citizens.

Furthermore, his reference to the "racehorse theory," where he suggests that genetic traits determine the quality of individuals, adds a layer of complexity to his discourse. This theory, which has problematic roots in eugenics, raises troubling questions about how Trump views the diverse groups of people in the country and their inherent value.

It is essential for society to respond to these comments with a critical and informed perspective. The idea that crime can be attributed to "bad genes" is not only scientifically unfounded but also perpetuates stigma and distrust towards entire communities that are largely hardworking and contribute positively to society.

The impact of the words of political leaders is significant. At a time when social and political polarization is on the rise, the responsibility to use language that fosters inclusion and understanding is greater than ever. Rhetoric that divides and dehumanizes not only affects those it targets but also erodes the social and cultural fabric of the nation.

As the next election approaches, it is likely that these issues will remain at the center of political debate. Voters will need to carefully consider the impact of the words and actions of candidates, especially on such sensitive matters as immigration. The future of social cohesion in the United States may depend on it.