"Biden authorizes the use of ATACMS missiles by Ukraine in a key geopolitical shift."

The recent decision by U.S. President Joe Biden to allow Ukraine to use long-range ATACMS missiles in its fight against the Russian invasion has sparked extensive debate about the geopolitical and military implications of this move. As of November 17, Ukraine has the green light to strike targets within Russian territory, marking a significant shift in U.S. policy that could influence the course of the conflict and simultaneously send a clear message to other global actors such as North Korea.

Since the onset of the war in Ukraine, the United States has been a crucial ally, providing weaponry and logistical support. However, the delivery of ATACMS, which have a range of 300 kilometers, represents a milestone in U.S. military support. These missiles, which had been held in reserve due to concerns about escalating the conflict, are now being released for use, enabling Ukraine to target Russian military installations that were previously beyond its reach.

The ATACMS missiles will be used to strike strategic positions within Russian territory, potentially altering the balance on the battlefield. The use of these missiles may not only boost the morale of Ukrainian forces but also strengthen their position in upcoming peace negotiations, especially with Donald Trump's imminent return to U.S. politics after January 20.

However, Biden's decision is not without criticism. Some experts argue that the previously imposed restrictions were based on valid concerns regarding the limited military utility of the ATACMS and the risk of escalating the conflict. In particular, the fact that most Russian aircraft conducting airstrikes against Ukraine have already been relocated and are now out of reach of these missiles raises questions about the effectiveness of this new strategy.

Despite these concerns, many in Ukraine and its allies believe there are still valid targets for the ATACMS. From ammunition depots to logistical centers, these missiles could be crucial in weakening Russia's capacity to continue its offensive. A former Ukrainian official has emphasized that, although some Russian aircraft are out of range, there are other critical targets that are not, justifying the use of these missiles.

An important aspect of this decision is how it may influence America's European allies. There is speculation that Britain and France might follow Biden's lead and allow Ukraine to use their cruise missiles on Russian territory. This possibility could create a domino effect, with other countries feeling pressured to increase their military support for Ukraine, which in turn could escalate Russia's response.

On the other hand, Moscow's response to this escalation in Western arms supply is a critical point. The Kremlin has warned that any use of Western missiles on Russian territory could trigger a "new spiral of tension." While the threats of a nuclear response seem exaggerated at this time, the situation remains volatile and prone to sudden changes.

With the possibility of Putin adopting a more aggressive stance, there are also concerns about increased Russian military activity in other regions, such as support for rebel groups in Yemen. This "horizontal escalation" could extend the conflict beyond Ukraine, further complicating the situation for Western countries.

Finally, it is essential for the Biden administration to carefully evaluate how it will manage this new phase of the conflict. The possibility of Trump seeking an agreement with Putin in the future adds an additional layer of complexity to the current dynamics. Meanwhile, the Ukrainian people continue to face a devastating conflict, and the international community watches with growing concern as events unfold in this critical region. The situation in Ukraine not only affects Europe but also has global repercussions that could redefine power relations in the 21st century.