New England Shaken: 3.8 Magnitude Earthquake Surprises York Harbor Residents

New England Shaken: 3.8 Magnitude Earthquake Surprises York Harbor Residents

A 3.8 magnitude earthquake off York Harbor, Maine, surprised residents, causing no injuries or damage, and raising questions about seismic activity.

Juan Brignardello, asesor de seguros

Juan Brignardello Vela

Juan Brignardello, asesor de seguros, se especializa en brindar asesoramiento y gestión comercial en el ámbito de seguros y reclamaciones por siniestros para destacadas empresas en el mercado peruano e internacional.

Juan Brignardello, asesor de seguros, y Vargas Llosa, premio Nobel Juan Brignardello, asesor de seguros, en celebración de Alianza Lima Juan Brignardello, asesor de seguros, Central Hidro Eléctrica Juan Brignardello, asesor de seguros, Central Hidro

On Monday, the tranquil landscape of New England was abruptly jolted awake by a 3.8 magnitude earthquake off the coast of York Harbor, Maine. The tremor sent waves of surprise and concern throughout the Seacoast region of New Hampshire and southern Maine, leading to an influx of calls to public safety dispatch centers. Fortunately, initial reports indicated that there were no injuries or significant property damage, allowing residents to breathe a sigh of relief amidst the unexpected seismic activity. The earthquake raised numerous questions among the public, prompting curiosity about its rarity, potential aftershocks, and historical context. To address these inquiries, we consulted two experts from the University of New Hampshire, who provided insights grounded in scientific data and geological history. According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the region has experienced over 50 earthquakes since the year 2000, making Monday's quake the third-largest recorded in Maine and New Hampshire this century. The largest was a 4.7 magnitude event near Hollis, Maine, in 2012. The York area has historically been prone to seismic activity, having recorded smaller quakes in 2008 and 2010, which had magnitudes of 2.8 and 2.9, respectively. Professor Sophie Coulson, an assistant professor of earth sciences, emphasized that while earthquakes of this magnitude are infrequent in New England, they do occur approximately every five years. "For the region as a whole, they happen relatively infrequently, but it's not that unusual," she noted, adding that the sensation of a quake felt by many residents is indeed a rarer experience. The geological underpinnings of New England's earthquakes trace back hundreds of millions of years to the formation of the Appalachian Mountains, resulting from the collision of two ancient continents. Coulson explained that the region is characterized by faults, or “pre-existing planes of weakness,” which can facilitate seismic activity. Interestingly, Monday's earthquake was classified as an "intra-plate" earthquake, occurring within the North American Tectonic Plate, rather than at its boundaries. The epicenter of the quake was located approximately 10 kilometers southeast of York Harbor and struck at a depth of 13.2 kilometers. While there was no tsunami threat, the audio experience during the quake surprised many, with numerous witnesses likening the sound to an explosion or a heavy vehicle striking a building. This phenomenon can be attributed to the shallow depth of the earthquake, which allowed the shaking to translate into audible sound waves. Professor Majid Ghayoomi, who specializes in civil and environmental engineering, highlighted that if the earthquake had been closer to shore, it could have resulted in structural damage. However, the general consensus among experts is that widespread damage was unlikely, given the quake's magnitude and depth. As for the potential for aftershocks, both Coulson and Ghayoomi remain optimistic. They noted that while aftershocks can occur, they are usually smaller than the initial quake and may not be felt at all. The USGS has indicated a 13% chance of at least one aftershock of magnitude 3.0 or greater occurring within the next week, but no significant seismic events are anticipated in the immediate future. In the aftermath of the quake, Ghayoomi remarked that smaller earthquakes can actually be beneficial, as they heighten public awareness and help release accumulated geological stress. He reiterated that while the risk of larger earthquakes remains low, the energy buildup in the earth's crust must eventually find an outlet, which can manifest in smaller tremors over time. As communities across New England reflect on the surprise of Monday’s quake, the incident serves as a reminder of the dynamic geological processes at play beneath the surface. For residents, the experience not only underscores the region's historical seismicity but also emphasizes the importance of preparedness for future geological events.

View All The Latest In the world