Trump warns that Israel could "disappear" if Harris wins the elections.

In an increasingly tense pre-electoral context, statements made by former President Donald Trump have caused a stir by claiming that Israel will "disappear" if Kamala Harris, the current vice president and Democratic candidate, wins the presidential elections in November. This comment, which mixes political rhetoric with the future of an allied nation, resonates not only in the U.S. political sphere but also on the international stage, where the relations between the United States and Israel are a topic of constant relevance. Trump, who has maintained a firmly pro-Israel stance during his time in office, has used this warning as part of his campaign strategy, urging voters to head to the polls and elect him again. In his rhetoric, the former president seeks not only to mobilize his base but also to instill fear among voters regarding the implications of a possible Democratic administration. This fear-based strategy has been a common tactic in political campaigns throughout history, but in this case, it intertwines with issues of national security and international diplomacy. Trump's statements are not unexpected given the current political climate, where polarization has reached extreme levels. Harris, who has been a prominent voice in the Biden administration, has become an easy target for the former president's criticism. However, the comment about the disappearance of Israel raises questions about the nature of political criticism and the use of international alliances as campaign tools. The Jewish community in the United States, which has played a crucial role in previous elections, is divided. Some leaders express concern over the incendiary tone of Trump's statements, while others believe it reflects a valid defense of the pro-Israel policies that the former president implemented during his administration. In this sense, the elections will not only determine the political future of the United States but also influence voters' perceptions and relations with Israel. The risk of escalating tensions in the Middle East is also associated with these elections. With the situation in Gaza and Hamas's role in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Trump's words could have repercussions not only in the electoral arena but also in international diplomacy. Experts warn that incendiary rhetoric can contribute to the polarization of opinions and a climate of instability in an already fragile region. Moreover, Trump's warning highlights the Republican candidate's strategy of positioning himself as the defender of Israel against Democratic policies, which are often perceived as less supportive. However, this approach may backfire when considering that the American electorate is increasingly interested in a balanced approach that takes into account both Israeli security and Palestinian rights. In this context, Kamala Harris represents an alternative that, according to Trump, could lead to drastic consequences for Israel. The vice president has advocated for a foreign policy aimed at promoting peace and stability in the region, but Trump argues that this equates to a threat to Israel's very existence. This debate over the future of Israel becomes a key tool in the struggle for the hearts of American voters. The elections in November have taken on new meaning as foreign policy issues intertwine with domestic concerns, from the economy to climate change. Trump's warning could be interpreted as a way to distract attention from other crucial issues, attempting to shift the focus to international tensions rather than the domestic problems that worry many voters. As election day approaches, it is likely that the statements and warnings from figures like Trump will continue to generate controversy and debate. The ability of these discourses to influence public opinion and voter turnout will become a crucial piece of the political puzzle. The international community, particularly Israel, will closely watch how events unfold in the United States, aware that the outcome of these elections will have a significant impact on future relations in the region. Meanwhile, voters face the difficult task of discerning between alarmist rhetoric and concrete proposals that will shape the direction of their country on the global spectrum. The elections in November will not only decide the future of American politics but will also raise questions about the role of the United States in the world, particularly concerning its traditional allies like Israel.