Intense electoral battle in the U.S. following tragedy and divisions over guns.

The political landscape in the United States became intense this Wednesday, with two of the leading candidates in the electoral race, Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, vying for the attention of voters at a critical moment less than two months before the elections. Both political figures are practically tied in the polls, making states like Nevada, Georgia, and Pennsylvania crucial for determining the electoral outcome. However, the campaign was overshadowed by a tragedy in Georgia, where a 14-year-old student opened fire in his school, resulting in a devastating toll of four dead. This tragic event reignited the debate over gun violence in the country and forced both candidates to issue immediate statements. Vice President Harris, at a rally in New Hampshire, urged the nation to put an end to what she called an "epidemic of gun violence." For his part, Trump, who has maintained a firm stance against gun control regulation, refused to focus on gun policy and opted to label the perpetrator of the massacre as a "sick and deranged monster." This difference in approaches to such a sensitive issue highlights the divisions that characterize American politics today. A CNN poll, which revealed a close competition between the two candidates, also showed that voters' decisions will center on some key states. In particular, Pennsylvania is shaping up to be the state that could decide who will occupy the White House next year. Harris, with a strategy focused on the middle and working classes, is trying to reverse her image and contrast her candidacy with that of Trump, who has been accused of favoring large corporations. As the campaign progresses, the vice president has emphasized concrete proposals, such as a significant expansion of tax relief for small business creation. However, despite her efforts, the pressure on Harris is increasing, as various critics are calling for more detail regarding her political plans, suggesting that her recent media exposure has lacked depth. Trump, for his part, has not missed the opportunity to harshly criticize Harris, suggesting that her victory would represent a disaster for the country. With incendiary rhetoric, the former president has attempted to downplay the impact that Harris's candidacy could have on the electorate, while his own initial lead in the polls seems to be fading. The campaign has also seen a return to a focus on industrial issues, with the steel company US Steel taking center stage after the announcement that Biden would block the company's purchase by Nippon Steel. This matter points to the current administration's efforts to protect American labor and economic interests, contrasting sharply with the image Trump is trying to project regarding his own economic legacy. As polls indicate that around 15% of voters remain undecided in swing states, Harris and Trump are preparing to intensify their efforts in these key territories. With mixed results in states like Wisconsin and Michigan favoring Harris and Arizona leaning toward Trump, the race appears to be at a crucial moment where every vote counts. As Harris prepares to focus on the seven states that will likely define the country's future, the challenge of connecting with voters and presenting a clear and coherent image of her proposals persists. In a landscape where emotions and ideologies are heightened, the ability of both candidates to sway the undecided will be decisive. In this way, the United States finds itself at a turning point, where tragedy and politics intertwine in a narrative that will continue to evolve in the weeks leading up to the elections. The candidates' ability to address sensitive issues and offer concrete solutions will be a crucial factor in voters' decisions in what is shaping up to be one of the most closely contested races in the recent history of the country.