Juan Brignardello Vela
Juan Brignardello, asesor de seguros, se especializa en brindar asesoramiento y gestión comercial en el ámbito de seguros y reclamaciones por siniestros para destacadas empresas en el mercado peruano e internacional.
The recent wave of protests in Israel has captured the attention of the entire world, triggered by the discovery of the bodies of six young people kidnapped by Hamas on October 7. This event has unleashed unprecedented outrage among the Israeli population, who blame Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for not doing enough to negotiate the release of the hostages still in the hands of the Palestinian organization. The situation has led tens of thousands of people to take to the streets, demanding a ceasefire in Gaza and an agreement that allows for the return of the 97 abducted individuals who remain in the Strip. Emotions have overflowed at the demonstrations, where chants such as “Alive, alive, we want them back alive!” can be heard. This outcry resonates in the streets of Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, and other cities, reflecting the desperation and pain of those who have lost loved ones or fear for their safety. Israeli authorities reported that the bodies found were of young people aged between 23 and 40, and the accounts regarding the causes of their deaths are contradictory. While the Israeli army claims they were executed, Hamas argues that they succumbed to injuries from Israeli bombings. The magnitude of the protests has been reinforced by the emotional impact that these kidnappings have had on Israeli society. The mobilizations have rapidly evolved from a spontaneous response to a general strike organized by Histadrut, the country’s main union, which seeks to pressure the government to take effective measures in favor of the hostages. This strike coincides with a critical moment, during which the Israeli economy has been partially paralyzed, affecting key sectors such as transportation and public services. Discontent is palpable, and the words of protesters like Yotam Peer, who lost his brother in the Hamas attack, reflect widespread frustration. “I couldn’t stay silent any longer,” he expressed, encapsulating the sentiment of many who feel the government is not doing enough to save the hostages. The situation has reached a point where the families of the kidnapped feel their voices must be heard and that the return of their loved ones should be the highest priority. However, Netanyahu's government response has been cautious. Although he has promised that there will be consequences for those responsible for the deaths of the hostages, he has avoided making direct comments about the protests and the general strike. This silence has generated even more frustration among the population, who see the prime minister as an obstacle to peace and conflict resolution. The lack of an effective agreement with Hamas has been a recurring topic in the discussions held, but the outcomes have been disappointing, with both sides blaming each other for the lack of progress. The impact of the strike has been significant, but not uniform. Some cities, such as Jerusalem, did not largely join the paralysis, leading to criticisms about the effectiveness of the movement. However, the support from major unions and political figures has given the protests a legitimacy and strength that cannot be ignored. The economy, already affected by the conflict, has felt the repercussions of the protests, adding another layer of tension to the situation. Meanwhile, the government’s response has not been long in coming. The Attorney General requested that the strike be declared illegal in court, and the judiciary granted this request, ending the paralysis ahead of schedule. This move has been backed by sectors close to Netanyahu, who argue that the strike is a political attempt that further harms the country’s economy at a delicate time. The chances that social pressure will force an agreement with Hamas, however, seem distant. Netanyahu, like some members of his cabinet, has made it clear that he has no intention of conceding to what they consider a terrorist organization. This has led to even greater polarization in public opinion, where some citizens criticize the protests and the strike, arguing that it is necessary to continue with normal life despite the tragedy. The fight for the release of the hostages is complicated in a context where violence has resulted in a devastating toll of thousands of lost lives, and the future appears uncertain. As protests continue and the strike causes a paralyzing effect in certain sectors, the question that lingers is whether this citizen outcry will influence a change in strategy by the Israeli government or if tensions will continue to escalate without a clear path toward resolution.