The presidential debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump will mark the 2024 race.

On September 10, Philadelphia will be the stage for the highly anticipated first presidential debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump, an event that promises to be crucial in the electoral race leading up to the 2024 elections. While the debate has been anticipated as an opportunity for both candidates to present their visions and policies, the controversy surrounding the debate rules has captured the attention of the media and the public. In a recent statement, Trump announced that an agreement was reached to mute the microphones during the debate, which has generated a series of reactions and speculations about how this change could affect the performance of both candidates. The decision to silence the microphones means that the candidates will not be able to openly interrupt each other, which could alter the dynamics of the debate and make interactions less confrontational. On the other hand, Harris's campaign has not immediately commented on this agreement, leaving many wondering whether they agree with the new conditions proposed by Trump’s team. Traditionally, presidential debates are a platform where candidates can not only present their arguments but also attempt to destabilize their opponent. With the microphones muted, this strategy could be more complicated to execute. The dispute over microphone usage has resurfaced in this contest, recalling the June debate that Trump had with President Joe Biden, where the former president decided to withdraw from the presidential race after a performance that, according to his own comments, was unsatisfactory. Trump has indicated that the rules for the upcoming debate will be identical to those of that event, which could suggest a more conservative strategy aimed at avoiding mistakes that could damage his image. One of the most interesting aspects of this situation is Harris's campaign's focus on the importance of keeping the microphones on. This type of interaction in a debate can generate unexpected moments that sometimes favor a candidate. With the microphones operational, candidates have the opportunity to make spontaneous comments that may resonate with the audience, but they also risk making statements that could be misinterpreted or used against them. Throughout the history of presidential debates in the United States, there have been numerous examples of how a small comment or an out-of-place reaction can significantly impact public perception of a candidate. This time, Trump’s more controlled approach could limit those unexpected moments, allowing him to avoid falling into rhetorical traps. The debate has also been subject to additional tensions due to accusations of bias toward the news networks organizing these events. Trump has expressed concern that ABC, the broadcaster responsible for moderating this debate, will not be impartial, leading to proposals from his campaign to explore other forums and platforms where he feels he could have a better opportunity to communicate with voters. Despite the tensions, both candidates are aware that this debate is not only an opportunity to express their positions on hot topics but also a crucial moment to connect with voters who have not yet made a decision. With the debate date fast approaching, the campaign teams have the task of preparing their candidates not only in terms of content but also in strategies to adapt to the event's rules. Meanwhile, Trump’s campaign has proposed an additional debate scheduled for September 4 on Fox News, but Harris's campaign has rejected it, suggesting that the vice president's team prefers to focus on the main debate. As the elections draw closer, the pressure on both candidates will increase, and each debate will represent an invaluable opportunity to influence public opinion. In summary, the first debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump presents itself as an event that could define the trajectory of both campaigns. With muted microphones and strict rules, the focus of this encounter will be different from previous debates, and the candidates will need to quickly adapt to a format that could change the way they communicate with the electorate. Attention now centers on how each of them will use this platform to captivate and persuade voters in an increasingly polarized political context.