Petroperú in crisis: Oliver Stark calls for urgent actions for restructuring.

The situation at Petroperú has become critical, and its president, Oliver Stark, has not hesitated to raise his voice to warn about the imminent need for decisions that could shape the direction of the state-owned company. In a recent interview on the program "Hora y treinta" on Canal N, Stark emphasized that “we have already reached the limit” and that the lack of action from the government is having significant repercussions on the company’s operations. One of the most alarming points Stark highlighted is the political interference that has been affecting Petroperú. According to his statements, this situation has led to a series of delays in making crucial decisions, which not only affects the company’s operational capabilities but also increases uncertainty in a sector that is already facing numerous challenges. “We are at a critical moment, and indecision only serves to make things worse,” asserted the president of Petroperú. Stark’s frustration is evident when he mentions that he has been “spending months” trying to gain clarity and obtain a decree that would allow progress on restructuring and financial stability plans. For him, these delays are not mere formalities, but rather have a real cost that translates into the deterioration of the company’s financial situation. “Every day that passes without a decision, the problem worsens,” he warned. One of the aspects Stark emphasizes in his remarks is the need for a "financial package" that would allow Petroperú not only to continue its current operations but also to establish a solid foundation for a sustainable future. The state-owned company, which has been a pillar in the country’s energy industry, finds itself at a decisive moment where the lack of support and direction could lead to irreversible consequences. Stark underscores that the restructuring of Petroperú is essential not only for its survival but also to avoid relying on future government bailouts. Financial independence has become an increasingly urgent goal. However, to achieve this, it is imperative that decisions are made in a timely and effective manner. The political instability in the country has directly impacted the management of Petroperú, creating an atmosphere of uncertainty that further complicates the situation. The lack of a clear operational framework has led the company to a state of paralysis, where necessary decisions are continuously postponed. “We are waiting for a response, but the response never arrives,” Stark expressed, reflecting the sense of helplessness felt by many within the company. The president of Petroperú is not only seeking a change in institutional management but also calling for the responsibility of all actors involved in the decision-making process. It is a call to action that resonates in a context where the economy and politics are closely intertwined. “We do not want to fight; we just need clarity to move forward,” he stated, hoping that his message resonates with the government. Stark’s words come at a time when public perception of Petroperú is at a crossroads. The company has faced criticism for its management and performance, but many also recognize its importance for the development of the energy sector in the country. The inability to act could lead to public opinion becoming even more critical, resulting in a loss of trust that could be difficult to regain. The situation at Petroperú reflects the challenges facing the state sector in the country. The intersection of politics and economics has created an environment where decision-making has become a complicated process. However, the urgency of the situation demands that all parties involved find a way forward that allows Petroperú to emerge from the crisis and restore its role as a key player in the industry. In conclusion, Oliver Stark’s call is not just a cry for help, but an invitation to reflect on the importance of making sound and timely decisions. The situation of Petroperú is a topic that should be closely monitored, not only for its impact on the national economy but also for what it represents in terms of governance and political responsibility. The future of this company is undoubtedly a matter that deserves renewed attention and decisive action.