JD Vance advocates for reversing Biden's immigration policies in light of the current crisis.

In a recent comment that has captured public attention, JD Vance, the Republican candidate for vice president of the United States, defended the need to reverse the immigration policies implemented by the Biden administration, stating that this is essential to address the crisis of illegal immigration that the country is facing. During his appearance on NBC News' "Meet the Press," Vance argued that the first step to regain control over immigration is to undo the actions taken by Vice President Kamala Harris since the beginning of her term. The senator from Ohio made a clear call to reinstate deportations, stop "detain and release" policies, and limit asylum to those who truly need it. Vance argued that current policies have significantly contributed to the immigration crisis and, critically, asserted that these have led to alarming situations, such as immigrant children ending up living with drug or sex traffickers. This statement points to a problem that many in the community have denounced for years, albeit with different nuances and approaches. When questioned about the implications of his proposals, especially regarding family separation, Vance avoided giving a direct answer. However, his comment that "families are already being separated now" suggests a stance that could generate controversy and debate in American society. This approach aligns with the tougher immigration rhetoric that has characterized Donald Trump's campaign, his running mate. In this context, Vance also emphasized the importance of focusing deportation efforts on the most violent criminals residing in the country. This suggests a more selective approach in his immigration policy, although the practical implementation of such measures always generates significant debate over human rights and family welfare. The Republican candidate continued to criticize the Department of Homeland Security, alleging that the number of irregular immigrants is being underestimated. According to him, this is a result of a shift in strategies employed by the Democratic government to manage crossings at the southern border. Vance accused the administration of making the process more efficient for illegal immigrants, a claim that has sparked reactions both within and outside the political realm. Vance's statements not only provoke reactions in the immigration sphere but also fit into a broader political discourse that includes criticism of Democratic economic policies. Vance reaffirmed Trump's protectionist vision, arguing that the lack of tariffs on companies importing from China will harm American workers in the long run. This comment resonates with an electorate that has felt the impact of globalization on their jobs and working conditions. In another area, Vance also addressed the recent endorsement of Donald Trump by former independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. According to him, this support indicates that the Republican Party is positioning itself as an "umbrella party" capable of attracting diverse currents within the political spectrum. However, Vance also expressed disagreement with Kennedy on certain aspects, especially concerning the conspiracy theories surrounding the September 11 attacks. The situation in Venezuela also became a relevant point of discussion, where Lula da Silva and Gustavo Petro, progressive leaders in Latin America, insist on the importance of disseminating acts following the TSJ's support for Nicolás Maduro. This international context could have implications for U.S. immigration policies, especially considering the number of Venezuelans seeking asylum in the country. Meanwhile, the detention of Telegram founder Pavel Durov in France for unspecified reasons adds another element to a global landscape filled with political and social tensions. This incident could resonate in the realm of technology and privacy, issues that are increasingly at the center of public debate. Thus, Vance's words reflect not only a stance against the Biden administration but also a broader context encompassing issues of immigration, social justice, and international politics. As elections approach, these discussions will become increasingly relevant for voters, who will seek to understand how the candidates' proposals will impact their lives and American society as a whole.