López Obrador remains cautious regarding Maduro's reelection in Venezuela.

In the midst of the controversy generated by the recent re-election of Nicolás Maduro, Mexican President Andrés Manuel López Obrador remains cautious and has not officially recognized the victory of the Venezuelan leader. During his daily press conference, López Obrador emphasized the importance of transparency in the electoral process, indicating that the dissemination of electoral records is fundamental to validating the results. "We will wait for them to release the records because yesterday the Electoral Tribunal of Venezuela stated that President Maduro won the election," he affirmed, showing his intention to act prudently. The stance of the Mexican president comes in a context where several countries in Latin America, as well as the United States, have expressed their rejection of the ruling by Venezuela's Supreme Tribunal of Justice (TSJ), which certified Maduro's victory in the elections held on July 28. Despite the criticism and condemnation from nations such as Chile, Argentina, and Peru, López Obrador chose not to join this chorus of disapproval, which has generated various interpretations of Mexico's foreign policy regarding Venezuela. López Obrador described himself as "respectful" of the decisions made in other countries, noting that there are a "lot" of disqualifications toward the Venezuelan government. This attitude reflects the philosophy of his administration to act in accordance with the Constitution and not interfere in the internal affairs of other countries. The phrase "the best foreign policy is domestic policy" resonates in his discourse, suggesting that López Obrador prefers to focus on Mexico's internal challenges before passing judgment on situations abroad. The Mexican president also mentioned that he has not had recent communication with Nicolás Maduro, recalling that their last meeting occurred in October during a summit on migration in Palenque, Chiapas. This fact reiterates the distance López Obrador has taken regarding the Venezuelan leader during this period of post-electoral crisis. His statement about contact with Maduro has been the subject of speculation, as some critics have hinted at a potential closer collaboration. Meanwhile, Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado has denounced the TSJ ruling, labeling it as "complicity with fraud." Machado has been a strong voice in demanding justice and transparency in the Venezuelan electoral process, and her statements reflect the discontent that persists among sectors opposing Maduro's regime. The situation in Venezuela has raised concerns about the legitimacy of its government and the democratic conditions in the country. López Obrador also revealed that he has had conversations with leaders from other countries in the region, such as Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva from Brazil and Gustavo Petro from Colombia, about the situation in Venezuela. However, by not recognizing Maduro's victory, the Mexican president appears to be carefully maneuvering in a complicated diplomatic terrain, where political and economic interests play a crucial role. The international community remains attentive to events in Venezuela, where political polarization and the humanitarian crisis have intensified. As events unfold, it will be essential to observe how Mexico and other Latin American countries position themselves in relation to a regime facing severe questions about its legitimacy. As the region faces interconnected challenges, López Obrador's stance could have repercussions not only for Mexico but also for the dynamics of relationships in Latin America. Meanwhile, the Venezuelan opposition continues to seek international support and visibility for its claims, adding another layer of complexity to the situation. In summary, López Obrador's caution and his call for transparency in the electoral process could be interpreted as an attempt to balance Mexico's internal and external interests. At a time when politics in Latin America seems to be at a crossroads, the Mexican president's approach will be closely watched by those seeking to understand the future of democracy in the region and the direction of international relations.