The PP will challenge the Amnesty Law and questions judicial impartiality in Spain.

The Popular Party (PP) has announced its intention to file a constitutional challenge against the Amnesty Law after the summer, marking a new chapter in the political contest in Spain. The general secretary of the PP, Cuca Gamarra, stated that the measure will be made public in September and has directed strong criticisms at the PSOE government, led by Pedro Sánchez, which she has labeled as "sloppy" in its legislative activities. Gamarra has not only criticized the law itself but has also questioned the impartiality of some judges on the Constitutional Court. In particular, she announced the intention to challenge them, pointing to Cándido Conde-Pumpido, the president of the court, and members Juan Carlos Campo and Laura Díez, who, according to her, do not provide guarantees of independence in resolving a challenge of this magnitude. This decision by the PP is set against a backdrop of growing distrust between political forces and the judicial system. The PP leader has noted that, although the effects of the amnesty law are already irreversible, the fight must continue to preserve the dignity of all Spanish citizens. "A future government that respects equality before the law can reverse the situation," she stated, thus drawing a clear line between the PP's proposal and the actions of the current government. Gamarra has openly criticized the government's attitude, suggesting that it has aligned itself with the interests of separatists, which, in her opinion, undermines the separation of powers, one of the fundamental pillars of democracy. This statement underscores a broader concern in society about the use of politics to maintain power through alliances with parties seeking to alter the territorial structure of the country. From Gamarra's perspective, the analysis of the first year of the legislature is unfavorable for the government. The 'popular' leader has stated that it has been characterized by what she terms "buying investitures," which, in her opinion, is a form of political corruption that should not be normalized in Spanish politics. The criticism extends to the management of the Executive, which, according to Gamarra, has prioritized its permanence in power over the common good. Despite the political and judicial pressure, Gamarra has expressed confidence that the new General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ) will defend the integrity of the judicial system and respond to the criticisms that have arisen regarding the application of the Amnesty Law. The PP leader sees this issue as a test of the Judiciary's resilience against the government's political interferences. Moreover, Gamarra has emphasized that this government has proven to be "disqualified for the normal functioning of democracy," suggesting that it should comply with and apply judicial resolutions when the law requires it. This reflects a desire to restore democratic normalcy at a time when political polarization seems to be increasing. The PP not only seeks to invalidate the Amnesty Law but also aims to position itself as the defender of equality before the law, at a time when political discourse has become increasingly divisive. Gamarra has made it clear that while the government may attempt to "pardon and grant amnesty," democracy and the Spanish citizens will not allow it. This confrontation over the Amnesty Law serves as a reminder of the deep divisions that currently exist in Spanish politics. The implications of this constitutional challenge will not only affect the law itself but will also shape the political landscape of the country in the coming months. The legal battle in the Constitutional Court is expected to be just the beginning of a broader debate about the nature of justice and politics in Spain. As elections approach, it remains to be seen how this conflict will influence public opinion and whether it will contribute to greater polarization or a potential shift in the country's political dynamics. The PP's strategy of questioning the legality of the Amnesty Law could be seen as an attempt to regain ground in a competitive political landscape where government decisions are increasingly criticized.