Peruvian Congress condemns human rights violations in Venezuela.

The full Congress of the Republic has taken a significant step in international politics by approving two motions that condemn the alarming political and social situation facing Venezuela. With 63 votes in favor, 25 against, and 13 abstentions, the legislators expressed their rejection of the systematic human rights violations perpetrated by the government of Nicolás Maduro. This decision comes in a context marked by serious irregularities in the recent electoral process that, despite opposition complaints, proclaimed Maduro president for a second time. The motions were driven by Fuerza Popular, which advocates for the support of the Peruvian Parliament for the Venezuelan people, and highlight the importance of protecting the civil and political rights of citizens. The text of the first motion, Motion of Order of the Day 12477, emphasizes the need for Venezuelan authorities to respect universal suffrage and guarantee electoral transparency, stating that the results must reflect the popular will. This stance aligns with the demands of many in the international community calling for a change in the governance of Venezuela. Meanwhile, Motion number 12613, supported by legislators from different political groups, focuses on condemning the repression and systematic violence suffered by the opposition. This document underscores the use of irregular groups by the government to intimidate dissidents and criticizes the abuse of power in the context of recent protests. Allegations of political persecution and the lack of an impartial judicial system have highlighted the urgency of the situation in the neighboring country. Congressman Alejandro Cabero, from Avanza País, was one of the most emphatic in demanding that the Venezuelan government demonstrate the legitimacy of its electoral victory, suggesting that the opposition has presented solid evidence of its triumph. This call for transparency resonates in the international community, which has questioned the credibility of the elections in Venezuela and urged for constructive dialogue to resolve the political crisis. However, not all legislators share this position. Congressman Guido Bellido, from Podemos Perú, defended Venezuela's sovereignty and called for respect for the electoral results. This viewpoint highlights the complexity of the debate, where sovereignty and human rights seem to be in a constant tug-of-war. For his part, Germán Tacuri, from the Magisterial Block, reminded that each nation must seek its own solutions to internal problems and emphasized the need for Venezuela to face its situation without external interference. Such statements suggest a non-intervention approach that contrasts with the stance of many other countries advocating for greater international pressure on the Maduro regime. Additionally, Jaime Quito, from the socialist bench, questioned the ability of Congress members to give lessons on democracy, pointing out that a commission to investigate the deaths that occurred during the protests in Peru has yet to be formed. This comment highlights the existing tension in the Peruvian political system and suggests that internal criticism must also be considered. Finally, Adriana Tudela, also from Avanza País, closed the debate with a strong statement: "There is no sovereignty without freedom." Her intervention underscores the need for Venezuelan citizens to enjoy their fundamental rights and freedoms, as well as the urgency for a change in Maduro's administration, which many see as an obstacle to democracy in the region. With these pronouncements, the Congress of Peru not only reflects concern for the situation in Venezuela but also reveals internal divisions on how to address the crisis. The international community remains attentive to developments in Venezuela, while the Venezuelan people continue their struggle to reclaim their rights and freedoms. In a context where democracy seems to be in danger, solidarity and international action become more necessary than ever.