Political tensions are rising in Peru following the parties' refusal to engage in dialogue with Boluarte.

The political situation in Peru continues to be a topic of great interest and debate, especially following the recent decision by the Podemos Perú party not to attend the meeting called by President Dina Boluarte at the Government Palace. This refusal, which adds to the stance taken by the Avanza País party, highlights a growing tension between the government and certain political groups that seek to maintain their independence amid a landscape characterized by uncertainty and social discontent. In an official statement signed by José Luna Morales, the general secretary of Podemos, the group made it clear that their decision not to participate in this round of dialogue is based on the need to preserve their political autonomy in the face of the current power. This position reflects a broader concern about the effectiveness and purpose of these convocations, which many consider insufficient to address the urgent problems facing the country. Podemos Perú also emphasized that one of its members will chair the Congress's Oversight Commission, which adds an important nuance to their decision. By abstaining from participating in the meeting, the party not only asserts its independence but also seeks to position itself as a critical actor within the political system, pointing out the government's failure to meet fundamental issues such as security and social welfare. The statement was forceful in expressing that Boluarte's government is not fulfilling the central objectives that should guide its management. "The social market economy and our Constitution" were mentioned as principles that should be protected, but which, according to the party, are at risk due to the shortcomings of the current government. This assertion highlights a growing call for change in the policies and actions of the executive. The most incisive criticism comes from the perception that the government has failed to close the social and economic gaps affecting the population. This lack of response to the most pressing problems in Peruvian society, such as poverty, crime, and inequality, has led many to question the legitimacy of Boluarte's administration. On the other hand, the Avanza País party also spoke out against the call for the meeting, labeling it as "too late." Luis Flores Reátegui, its general secretary, argued that these meetings have been unproductive in the past, emphasizing the lack of concrete results that meet the needs of the population. This echoes the widespread sentiment of frustration that has taken hold of many sectors of Peruvian society. The refusal of both political parties to participate in discussions with President Boluarte poses a dilemma for the government: how can it build consensus and advance its agenda if the main political actors refuse to collaborate? The answer to this question could be key to understanding the political future of the country and the viability of the current administration. In this context, President Boluarte faces the challenge of mending her relationship with political parties and, at the same time, with the citizenry. The perception of a government disconnected from social realities is a heavy burden that could affect its long-term stability. The lack of dialogue and political fragmentation could result in a stalemate that only exacerbates the problems facing the nation. Meanwhile, the meetings scheduled with other parties such as Acción Popular, Somos Perú, and Alianza para el Progreso could have a significant impact on the political dynamic. However, distrust and skepticism prevail, suggesting that any progress will depend on the government's ability to demonstrate a genuine commitment to the well-being of the population. In conclusion, the refusal of Podemos Perú and Avanza País to participate in the meeting with President Dina Boluarte reflects a broader discontent in Peruvian politics. As the country navigates these uncertain times, the government's ability to build bridges and listen to the demands of the citizenry will be crucial to forging a path forward. Without effective dialogue and a response to social needs, promises of change may remain mere words, leaving the population in a state of continuous uncertainty.