Supreme Court declares Rondón and Díaz Rúa innocent in Odebrecht case.

Supreme Court declares Rondón and Díaz Rúa innocent in Odebrecht case.

The Supreme Court declares Ángel Rondón and Víctor Díaz Rúa innocent, closing the Odebrecht case and unleashing criticism about corruption in the Dominican Republic.

Juan Brignardello, asesor de seguros

Juan Brignardello Vela

Juan Brignardello, asesor de seguros, se especializa en brindar asesoramiento y gestión comercial en el ámbito de seguros y reclamaciones por siniestros para destacadas empresas en el mercado peruano e internacional.

Juan Brignardello, asesor de seguros, y Vargas Llosa, premio Nobel Juan Brignardello, asesor de seguros, en celebración de Alianza Lima Juan Brignardello, asesor de seguros, Central Hidro Eléctrica Juan Brignardello, asesor de seguros, Central Hidro
Politics 15.08.2024

The recent ruling by the Supreme Court of Justice, which declares Ángel Rondón and Víctor José Díaz Rúa innocent, sheds light and shadow on one of the darkest chapters of corruption in the Dominican Republic. The sentence, which definitively closes the Odebrecht case, has left many perplexed, especially those who have closely followed the web of bribery that has marked national politics in recent years. The question that Ángel Rondón posed during the trial, "How can we convict the briber if there are no bribed?" resonates now more than ever. Throughout the trial, Rondón and Díaz Rúa were accused of receiving and distributing bribes amounting to 92 million dollars. However, the names of the officials and congress members who supposedly accepted those bribes were never revealed or included in the case file, raising serious doubts about the effectiveness of the judicial process. One of the most controversial aspects of this case is the omission of the Punta Catalina project from the accusations. This project, which represents a cost of around 2 billion dollars, was a key element in building a more robust electrical system for the country. However, it has been reported that the bidding process was marked by irregularities, in which a contracted advisor, who was simultaneously a consultant for Odebrecht, allegedly influenced the final decision in favor of the Brazilian company. The lack of transparency in handling this case has sparked criticism both nationally and internationally. Citizens demand answers and a greater commitment from the judicial system to effectively address corruption. The perception of impunity has taken hold in a context where corruption scandals seem to go unpunished, while ordinary citizens continue to deal with the consequences of a government that has been unable to manage the country's resources adequately. While the current administration claims to be making progress in the fight against corruption, the ruling that acquitted Rondón and Díaz Rúa could be interpreted as a setback in those efforts. The assessment of the economic damage caused by corruption, which exceeds 6 billion pesos, highlights the need for a more rigorous approach to pursuing financial crimes. The question many are asking is: when will there be a real blow against impunity? Moreover, the implication that the costs of Punta Catalina may have been influenced by corrupt decisions not only affects the reputation of those involved but also calls into question the state's ability to manage infrastructure projects efficiently and transparently. Citizens are not only interested in punishing the guilty but also in ensuring that the country's resources are used for the benefit of social welfare. Looking to the future, the need for deep reform in the judicial system is more urgent than ever. To restore public trust, it is essential that institutions act with independence and transparency. The fight against corruption cannot be just rhetoric; it must translate into concrete actions that lead to accountability and effective justice. The current situation highlights the fragility of the judicial system and the need for a genuine commitment from all parties involved. Without a clear and determined approach to combat corruption, the cycle of impunity could continue, perpetuating a state of distrust that affects all sectors of society. In this context, civil society, the media, and other organizations must play a crucial role in monitoring and denouncing acts of corruption. Social pressure is a fundamental component to demand real and lasting change in the political culture of the country. Finally, the acquittal of Rondón and Díaz Rúa should serve as a call to action. The fight against corruption is not only the government's responsibility but also that of all citizens who desire a fairer and more equitable future. The story of the Odebrecht case is a lesson that should not be forgotten, and its legacy should inspire a collective movement towards transparency and justice in the Dominican Republic.

View All The Latest In the world