Indecopi rejects accusations of improper payments in trademark registration and demands evidence.

The National Institute for the Defense of Competition and the Protection of Intellectual Property, known as Indecopi, has become embroiled in controversy following allegations of supposed improper payments related to trademark registration. In an official statement, the entity categorically rejected these claims, labeling them as unfounded and lacking evidence. The accusations arose in a digital broadcast program that alleged that some Indecopi officials had requested unjustified payments from those wishing to register their trademarks. This information has begun to generate concern among business sector participants and entrepreneurs, who view trademark registration as a fundamental step in protecting their innovations and establishing their market presence. In its defense, Indecopi emphasized that it operates under strict regulations and has highly qualified personnel to carry out its functions. The entity made it clear that any denial of trademark registration is based on technical and autonomous criteria, always in compliance with the law. This position aims to uphold the integrity and ethics of the processes managed by the organization. Given the severity of the accusations, Indecopi has indicated that it will take legal action against those who have disseminated these unfounded claims. This step is considered essential to safeguard both the institution's reputation and that of its public servants, who are dedicated to fulfilling their duties responsibly and transparently. Furthermore, Indecopi has urged the authors of the complaint to present concrete evidence to support their claims. This invitation comes in a context where the fight against corruption is a priority for state institutions. The entity has reaffirmed its commitment to a zero-tolerance policy on corruption and has expressed its willingness to cooperate with any investigations that may arise from these accusations. Indecopi's rejection of the allegations also fits into a broader context where the integrity of public institutions is constantly being tested. In recent years, multiple corruption allegations have emerged across various government entities, leading to increasing distrust among citizens. In this sense, Indecopi's response can be seen as an effort to restore confidence in its management. It is important to note that trademark registration is a fundamental process for business development in the country, as it protects intellectual property rights and fosters innovation. Therefore, the accusations against Indecopi generate concern not only within the entity but also among the thousands of entrepreneurs seeking to secure their products and services in the market. The situation has also sparked a broader debate about transparency in public institutions and the need for a legal framework that protects both citizens and public officials from unfounded accusations. Indecopi's response can be viewed as a call for responsibility from both the media and citizens to foster constructive dialogue rather than fuel rumors that can deeply affect the work of institutions. Indecopi has reaffirmed its commitment to transparency and legality, and through its actions, it hopes not only to clear its name but also to contribute to a fairer and more equitable environment for all market participants. In this regard, the coming weeks will be crucial for the investigative process that will take place and for determining the impact this controversy will have on the public perception of the entity and its management.