Galarreta demands a statement from the Andean Parliament regarding Venezuela and Maduro.

Luis Galarreta, former congressman of Fuerza Popular, has made a strong call to the Andean Parliament to adopt a clear and decisive stance regarding the regime of Nicolás Maduro in Venezuela. In a statement, Galarreta highlights the grave situation facing the Venezuelan people, characterized by prolonged human rights violations and systematic repression of the opposition. This declaration comes in a context where 91% of Peruvians believe that there was fraud in the recent elections in Venezuela, underscoring the urgency for an institutional response. The former parliamentarian is alarmed by the actions of the Andean Parliament, which has yet to issue a clear statement on the situation in Venezuela. Galarreta emphasizes the need for the members of this body to explicitly express their position regarding Maduro's government, and demands that the public be informed whether there is a majority supporting the regime's actions or if, conversely, there is significant dissent within. This demand is framed within the responsibility that elected representatives have to address the crises affecting the region. This call to action comes at a time when the Andean Parliament appears divided. While the president of the Board of Directors, Eduardo Salhuana, has expressed support for the fraud allegations in Venezuela, the response from the vice president, Waldemar Cerrón, contradicts this position, indicating that the elections were conducted transparently. This lack of consensus among the leaders of the Andean Parliament is concerning, as it reflects a lack of clarity regarding one of the region's most significant political crises. The situation in Venezuela, marked by political and social instability, has generated a massive exodus of citizens seeking refuge in other countries in the region. This phenomenon has tested the response capacity of Andean countries and highlights the need for coordinated and effective action in response to the humanitarian crisis. Galarreta insists that the lack of a firm stance from the Andean Parliament is not only a failure of political responsibility but also a neglect of the urgent needs of thousands of Venezuelans. In this context, the role of the Andean Parliament becomes relevant, not just as a forum for dialogue but as an organization that has the potential to influence strategic decisions impacting the lives of millions of people. Galarreta criticizes that, despite the seriousness of the situation, the Parliament has not made a strong statement, which could be interpreted as a lack of interest in the realities faced by its citizens. The former congressman also laments that the upcoming plenary session, scheduled for August 28, is perceived as an excessively long deadline to address a matter that is of vital importance for democracy and human rights in the region. The urgency of the situation demands an immediate response, rather than waiting for a scheduled meeting that could delay the adoption of concrete measures. Pressure for the Andean Parliament to act comes not only from the international community but also from the citizens themselves. With a significant percentage of the Peruvian population convinced that the elections in Venezuela were fraudulent, it becomes evident that there is a social demand for a clear and defined response that addresses human rights violations and the lack of democracy in the neighboring country. Furthermore, the controversy surrounding the legitimacy of the elections in Venezuela has opened a debate about the responsibility of international organizations in overseeing and verifying elections in contexts where their transparency is questioned. In this case, Galarreta's demand for the Andean Parliament to take a stance could serve as a platform to foster discussion about electoral integrity in the region. The future of Venezuela and its relationship with Andean countries will largely depend on the ability of their leaders to establish a firm and united position in the face of the crisis. The pressure from the international community and public opinion are factors that could push the Andean Parliament to make bolder decisions in favor of democracy and respect for human rights. The current situation underscores the need for regional bodies, such as the Andean Parliament, to assume their role in defending democracy and the fundamental values that should prevail in any society. Galarreta's voice thus joins a growing chorus calling for justice and solidarity with the Venezuelan people in their struggle for a dignified life free from oppression.