Political crisis in Peru: between internal struggle and citizen distrust.

The situation in Venezuela has dominated headlines in recent weeks, but in Peru, attention has shifted to the country's internal problems. As international pressure on Nicolás Maduro's regime seems to have eased, Peruvians are refocusing on their own realities, presenting a mosaic of political and social conflicts. From the case of Nicanor Boluarte to the controversy over Alberto Fujimori's lifetime pension, Peruvian politics appears to be mired in an endless cycle of controversies. The request for preventive detention for Boluarte has reignited political tension and fueled discussions about the legitimacy of her government. In this context, the struggle between different political factions intensifies, with Fujimoristas and anti-Fujimoristas engaged in a tug-of-war that seems never-ending. This polarization affects not only the political class but also impacts public perception of governance and democracy in the country. On the other hand, winning a bronze Olympic medal has been a moment of national joy. However, even this triumph has faced criticism, with some questioning the athlete's socioeconomic background and political positioning. This phenomenon highlights a troubling trend where one person's success can be viewed with suspicion by others, revealing a lack of unity and recognition that should prevail during moments of celebration. Alberto Fujimori's lifetime pension has garnered media and public attention, sparking a heated debate. This issue raises questions about the political interests behind the decision and the potential repercussions for those who support it. Why risk reigniting anti-Fujimorism in a country still healing from past wounds? The answer may lie in the pursuit of political capital, although this strategy could backfire, harming the parties involved in the process. The decisions made by Fuerza Popular and Alianza para el Progreso regarding sensitive issues like Fujimori's pension could have lasting effects on public perception. While some see these actions as a shrewd political maneuver, others consider them a clear mistake that could prove costly in future elections. The narrative of a strong alliance between FP, APP, and Dina Boluarte's government could erode voter trust, which is already weary of internal struggles and corruption scandals. Furthermore, the perception of political parties in Congress is affected by their behavior and closeness to the government. Despite their attempts to distance themselves from Pedro Castillo's legacy, their active participation in the government and questionable legislative decisions contribute to an image of complicity among the populace. This conflict of interest and the lack of a clear and effective opposition allow narratives to strengthen that could be detrimental to the country's political future. The political mistakes made in recent months are evident. The series of controversial decisions that have emerged have not only drawn criticism from the opposition but have also generated distrust among voters. Recent history shows that these errors can be used as ammunition in electoral campaigns, jeopardizing the political survival of those who today seem to hold the reins of power. In this climate of uncertainty, it is crucial for political leaders to reflect on their actions and decisions. The lack of a coherent strategy that acknowledges the Peruvian reality could lead to a loss of popular support in upcoming elections. Public perception is volatile, and what may seem like a safe decision today could become a heavy burden in the future. Meanwhile, radical opposition groups are trying to capitalize on these opportunities. Those who have been prevented from running for office are now seeking to reverse the situation by taking advantage of widespread discontent. With a compelling discourse that resonates with an electorate weary of corruption and ineffectiveness, these groups position themselves as the true reformers that the country needs. Thus, the Peruvian political landscape becomes increasingly complex, with a constant struggle for relevance and legitimacy. In a country where no one seems to know who they are truly working for, the real question is: what direction will Peru take in the coming months, and who will be capable of offering an effective solution to the problems it faces? The answer to this question could define the future of the country.