Guido Bellido joins Podemos Perú and transforms the political map of Congress.

The recent addition of Congressman Guido Bellido to the Podemos Perú caucus has altered the political landscape of Congress, consolidating this group as the second parliamentary minority, alongside Alianza para el Progreso. With this addition, the caucus led by José Luna Gálvez now has a total of 14 members, granting it greater influence in legislative decisions and the formation of committees. Guido Bellido, who was previously part of Perú Libre and served as Prime Minister during Pedro Castillo's government—who is currently imprisoned for his involvement in an attempted coup—has expressed that his decision to join Podemos Perú aims to actively participate in Congress. "I want to participate in committees, schedule bills, and intervene in the Plenary," he stated on his social media, suggesting that his interest is more legislative than partisan. However, Bellido's history is complex and marked by his ties to a government that left a trail of questions in Peruvian politics. His time in Castillo's cabinet, which was rife with controversies and accusations of corruption, has generated distrust among sectors of the population and has called his political loyalty into question. Additionally, his recent enrollment in the group Pueblo Consciente, which has yet to gain official recognition, adds another layer of uncertainty to his political future. Bellido's decision to join Podemos Perú also hints at a search for new alliances in a politically charged context. Luna Gálvez's group is under scrutiny from the Public Ministry for several irregularities, including the alleged irregular registration of its party and its ties to illegal contributions from Brazilian companies Odebrecht and O.A.S. in previous campaigns. These backgrounds not only compromise the image of Podemos Perú but also create a scenario of instability that could affect its legislative performance. Meanwhile, Bellido's break with Perú Libre and his approach to Podemos Perú can be interpreted as an attempt at political reconfiguration within a system that has shown its fragility in recent years. Peruvian politics has been characterized by the ebb and flow of alliances and disloyalties, and Bellido’s incorporation could reflect this changing dynamic. On the other hand, by becoming the second minority in Congress, Podemos Perú and APP could form a strategic alliance to promote certain bills that align with their interests. The ability of these parties to work together could be decisive in a Congress where political fragmentation is the norm. However, internal tensions and ideological differences between the two groups could hinder such collaborations. The repercussions of this union will be felt in Congress, where the legislative agenda is complicated by the diversity of interests and the lack of consensus. Bellido's arrival could generate new dynamics in the committees where key issues such as the economy, health, and education are debated. As the legislature progresses, it will be crucial to observe how this new composition translates into concrete actions and the ability to influence the most relevant decisions in the country. In another context, Bellido's expressed intention not to engage in partisan political issues raises suspicions about his true motivations. As the electoral cycle approaches, movements and alliances in Congress become increasingly strategic, leading to questions about the honesty of the intentions behind such decisions. Ultimately, Bellido's arrival at Podemos Perú serves as a reminder that Peruvian politics remains an uncertain terrain, where loyalties shift and parties seek to strengthen their positions in a hostile environment. The citizenry, for its part, watches these movements closely, aware that every decision in Congress impacts their daily lives. In this sense, the challenge lies in ensuring that elected representatives act responsibly and in the interest of collective well-being, rather than being swayed by personal or partisan interests.