"Allegations of a connection between a congressional advisor and a football club during working hours."

The recent complaint presented on the program "Panorama" has placed Congress President Eduardo Salhuana and his office at the center of controversy. According to the report, Jamill Marzuka Cortez, an advisor who works for Salhuana, also holds a position at the César Vallejo club in Trujillo, which is linked to politician César Acuña. The most alarming aspect of the situation is that both jobs overlap during Congressional working hours. Marzuka Cortez, who serves as a Marketing and Communications advisor for the César Vallejo club, receives a salary exceeding S/7,000 monthly for his work in Salhuana's office. However, his presence at club events during Congressional work hours raises serious doubts about the ethics of his dual employment. The situation becomes even more complicated upon observing that he was seen at a recent event—the presentation of renowned footballer Paolo Guerrero as the club's new player—during a workday. In addition to these events, it has been documented that Marzuka attended the signing of an agreement between the club and a sponsor on January 21, 2023, a working day in Congress. Despite this evidence, there have been no recorded salary deductions for work absences, suggesting a lack of oversight or regulation regarding the activities of Congressional officials. When asked about Marzuka's situation, Salhuana displayed a clear lack of knowledge about his advisor's employment status. Initially, he acknowledged knowing the advisor but later questioned whether he actually worked in his office. "I understand he works for the APP caucus; I would have to check," he stated. This lack of clarity regarding the employment status of his advisors raises concerns about transparency and accountability within the Legislative branch. For his part, Marzuka defended himself by claiming that his work at the César Vallejo club does not interfere with his responsibilities in Congress, arguing that his duties for the club are carried out at different times, primarily on weekends. However, the discrepancy between his version and the evidence presented by "Panorama" leaves a sense of distrust surrounding his statement. The situation not only concerns the personal ethics of an official but also raises questions about the use of public resources and the actual dedication of advisors working in Congress. Is it acceptable for a public official to have a second job that overlaps with their official hours? This ethical dilemma could have broader repercussions on public perception regarding the integrity of political institutions. Experts warn that the expansion of illegal mining in the country is closely linked to connections between the political sector and illicit activities. Marzuka's situation could be yet another example of how certain opaque practices can permeate governmental structures. In this context, the complaint from "Panorama" serves as a call for reflection on the need for greater regulation and oversight regarding public officials' employment. For citizens, the fact that an advisor to the President of Congress is linked to a football club while receiving a salary from the state may be seen as an abuse of trust. The lack of clarity and ambiguity in Salhuana's statements regarding Marzuka's employment status do not contribute to restoring trust in institutions. As the situation unfolds, it will be crucial to observe how the Congressional Ethics Office and other relevant authorities address this complaint. Citizens demand a clear response and actions that guarantee transparency and legality in the functioning of Congress. The government's ability to handle these situations effectively is fundamental to maintaining legitimacy and public trust in democracy. In a context where politics faces constant criticism for corruption and lack of ethics, each case like this represents an opportunity to set precedents and strengthen institutions. Transparency and accountability must be fundamental pillars of public service, and Eduardo Salhuana's case is an opportunity to reflect on these essential values.