Political crisis in Peru: Dina Boluarte faces discontent and social pressure.

The political situation in Peru has reached a critical point, marked by the figure of President Dina Boluarte, who, after assuming power during a time of national instability, has become a symbol of a self-absorbed and absent administration. Since her arrival in office, there were expectations that Boluarte would use her position to promote significant changes in a country facing deep challenges. However, instead, her mandate has been characterized by a lack of initiative and an alarming conformity to the interests of a political coalition that has made detrimental decisions for the country. It is undeniable that Boluarte faced a series of challenges from the very first day of her presidency. The dismissal of her predecessor, Pedro Castillo, left a power vacuum that quickly translated into protests and social discontent. However, this does not exempt the president from responsibility for her decisions. Despite the adverse circumstances, the option of calling for early elections and letting the citizenry decide the country's direction was on the table. Instead of opting for a democratic exit, Boluarte chose to remain in power, a decision that has negatively marked her administration. Throughout her term, President Boluarte has opted to surround herself with hardline figures and has allowed repression to take over the government’s response to protests. This approach has resulted not only in isolating her administration but also in an international discrediting of Peru, which has seen its reputation deteriorate before the world. Instead of becoming a beacon of hope for women and marginalized communities, Boluarte has perpetuated an image of indifference and lack of leadership. The lack of connection with the grassroots that once supported her has been particularly concerning. Recent polls reveal a disheartening picture: nearly half of Peruvians would support a coup if presented as a solution to corruption. This perception that corruption is uncontrollable has fueled discontent and despair among the population, with young people being the most affected, as two out of three express a desire to leave the country in the coming years. Dina Boluarte, who came to power with a significant opportunity to make history, has failed to seize her potential. Her status as Peru's first female president, hailing from a poor, Quechua-speaking region, granted her powerful symbolism that could have inspired many. Unfortunately, her term has been marked by a lack of direction and decisions that have eroded trust in political leadership. The predatory coalition she has formed has cost her the support of sectors that could have been allies in the pursuit of real change. Peruvian politics needs a change of course, and Boluarte finds herself at a crossroads. Criticism of her administration comes not only from the opposition but also from her own voters. The possibility of reversing this negative spiral is becoming increasingly difficult. The disinterest of citizens in politics is reflected in the fragmentation of political discourse and a growing detachment from the institutions that should serve the people. July 28 presents a crucial opportunity for Boluarte. If she wishes to avoid being remembered as one of the greatest disappointments in Peru's republican history, she must act decisively and generate significant change. History does not forgive leaders who remain inactive, and the president has the responsibility to demonstrate that she is capable of listening to the demands of a people tired of corruption and inefficiency. However, the shadow of justice looms over Boluarte. As evidence of questionable decisions and possible human rights violations accumulates, it is likely that her political future will rest in the hands of the law. The perception of her inaction and the lack of a clear agenda for change have given rise to speculation about her legacy and the impact of her presidency on a country struggling for stability. Peruvian politics faces an uncertain future, and Boluarte's role is fundamental in shaping that future. History will judge her term not only by achievements but also by missed opportunities. The president must decide whether she wants to be remembered as a leader who allowed stagnation to continue or as a figure who ultimately rose against adversity to transform the reality of her nation. Time is of the essence, and the responsibility lies in her hands.