Judicial stagnation of Martinelli complicates Panamanian politics and its future.

During a press conference last Thursday, the President of Panama, José Raúl Mulino, made statements reflecting the stalled situation of former president Ricardo Martinelli, who is currently seeking asylum in the Nicaraguan embassy. According to Mulino, "there is no progress" in Martinelli's case, who has been in this status since March of this year after being sentenced to over ten years in prison for corruption crimes. This situation has raised numerous questions about the administration of justice in Panama and the political impact that Martinelli continues to have in the country. The former leader, who governed Panama from 2009 to 2014, has been at the center of various controversies, including corruption scandals linked to the Brazilian construction company Odebrecht and other cases of illegal wiretapping. For Martinelli, these trials are considered "political trials," adding a layer of conflict to his current situation. However, President Mulino emphasized that the issue is handled by the judicial system and not by the Executive, suggesting a separation of powers that, in practice, could be more complex. From his asylum in the Nicaraguan embassy, Martinelli has maintained an active voice in Panamanian politics, supporting Mulino's candidacy, who, in turn, was his protégé in the May elections. This relationship has generated speculation about Martinelli's influence in the new government, especially considering that some officials from his administration have been retained in key positions in Mulino's cabinet. This raises questions about the new president's independence and his ability to distance himself from the shadow of his predecessor. Martinelli's situation is also an example of the complexities of political asylum in the region. Although he has requested a safe conduct to travel to Nicaragua, the government of Laurentino Cortizo, his predecessor, denied this permission, which could indicate a lack of willingness on the part of the current administration to facilitate his exit. Mulino, barely a month in power, seems to be walking a tightrope, trying to maintain political stability while navigating the murky waters of corruption and asylum. The fact that a new safe conduct has not been requested suggests that the situation could remain in limbo for some time. With no progress in the case, an atmosphere of uncertainty is created for both Martinelli and Panamanian politics in general. The figure of the former president remains polarizing, and his return, whether to politics or to freedom, could have significant repercussions. Political analysts have warned that Mulino's administration may be affected by the ongoing association with Martinelli, which could hinder the implementation of policies aimed at distancing from corruption. As the new president attempts to establish his own agenda and leadership, Martinelli's relevance could become a persistent obstacle. In this context, Nicaragua's role as a refuge for Martinelli is not insignificant. The country, under President Daniel Ortega, has been perceived as an ally for those in similar situations of political persecution. However, the relationship between the two former leaders could complicate Mulino's image on the international stage, especially at a time when transparency and accountability are crucial issues in the region. On the other hand, the international community is keeping an eye on the situation, and Martinelli's future could influence diplomatic relations between Panama and other countries. As Mulino's administration settles in, the pressure to resolve the former president's case could increase, both internally and externally. In conclusion, Ricardo Martinelli's situation, seeking asylum and with no progress in his case, represents a microcosm of the current political struggles in Panama. Mulino's administration faces the challenge of finding a balance between justice and politics, while Martinelli's figure remains a hot topic that affects not only internal politics but also the external perception of the country. The lack of movement in this case could have lasting repercussions for governance in Panama, creating a cycle of uncertainty that will be difficult to break.