Controversial candidates stir up the electoral landscape in Peru: Toledo, Castillo, Fujimori, and Humala generate controversy ahead of the 2026 elections.

In a politically charged climate, where corruption and ethical questions have marked the recent history of Peru, the emergence of figures like Alejandro Toledo, Pedro Castillo, Alberto Fujimori, and Antauro Humala as possible presidential candidates for the 2026 general elections has generated controversy and reignited the debate about the suitability of the candidates to occupy the highest office in the country. Antauro Humala, known for being an ethnocacerist leader and former military officer, has expressed his intention to run for the presidency despite having been sentenced to 25 years in prison for the Andahuaylaso case. This situation poses a challenge for the National Jury of Elections, which will have to assess if he meets the legal requirements to participate in the electoral process. Specifically, it must be determined if he has served his sentence and paid the ordered civil reparation. On the other hand, Alejandro Toledo, currently in preventive detention for alleged corruption offenses linked to Odebrecht, has joined the Green Democratic Party with an eye on the 2026 elections. Despite his legal situation, experts point out that, as he does not have a sentence against him, Toledo could legally run for public office. However, the feasibility of an electoral campaign from prison would be highly complicated. Regarding Pedro Castillo, recently Peru's president, the law would prevent him from running for the presidency again due to his recent term. However, he could opt for other positions such as senator or deputy. This legal limitation could influence his future plans in the political arena. The candidacy of Alberto Fujimori, announced by the Popular Force party, has sparked a debate about his eligibility due to his criminal record for crimes against humanity and corruption. Experts argue that the Special Electoral Jury will have to assess if Fujimori still has his citizenship suspended and if the pardon he received would restore his right to run for office. However, the legal prohibition for those convicted of intentional crimes could be an insurmountable obstacle for his candidacy. Faced with this scenario, prominent figures in the legal and political spheres have expressed concern about the proliferation of candidates with questionable backgrounds. Ernesto de la Jara, a professor at the Pontifical Catholic University of Peru, has emphasized the need for political leaders who are honest and have no ties to corruption or coup attempts. In his view, the citizens deserve transparent candidates committed to the country's well-being, not figures tainted by crimes or unethical behavior. In this context, Peruvian society faces a crucial challenge in choosing its leaders, where integrity, transparency, and respect for the law must prevail over individual interests. The Peruvian democracy is at a crossroads, where the selection of its leaders will shape the country's direction in the coming years. It is the responsibility of citizens to inform themselves, reflect, and actively participate in the electoral process to ensure a democratic and prosperous future for all Peruvians.