The truckers' strike crisis reveals tensions in the Historical Pact and fiscal fragility.

The recent situation generated by the truckers' strike has highlighted the tensions within the Historical Pact and revealed the fragility of President Gustavo Petro's government's strategy. According to sources close to the coalition, the fiscal management of the situation by Finance Minister Ricardo Bonilla has been deemed "inhumane" and has led the president into a "dead end" that has cost him credibility with his own voters. The truckers, who mostly supported the government in the 2022 elections, now feel that their interests have been betrayed, especially after the attempt to clear the roads by force. The discontent has not been limited to the truckers. Experts and analysts have expressed concern over the decisions made during the negotiations. Former superintendent Pablo Felipe Robledo strongly criticized the agreements, asserting that they violate free economic competition and represent a setback in public policies. His comment reflects a growing fear in some sectors that the government is not prepared to handle the complexity of the current crisis. Despite the lifting of the strike, several analysts agree that the situation cannot be considered a victory. Juan Camilo Restrepo, a former minister and columnist, argued that the government's flexibility in negotiating avoided greater harm, but also left the country with a persistent fiscal problem. The truckers, for their part, have faced criticism for causing inconveniences to those not involved in the conflict, which has weakened their social position. The crisis has also called into question the administration's ability to manage public financing. It has been warned that the government may be forced to resort to the country's international reserves or, in a riskier move, to print money—options that have always been met with skepticism by society. The lack of resources has also resulted in delays in payroll payments to government workers, creating a climate of unease in various entities. Meanwhile, the Constitutional Court is facing a flood of lawsuits against the pension reform, which could set a record in terms of litigation. Although many of these lawsuits lack solid foundations, the possibility that the regulation could be declared unconstitutional has led the government to explore alternative plans. The uncertainty surrounding the reform could have serious repercussions on the investments already being made to ensure pension management. In this context, domestic politics is also heating up. The Democratic Center is preparing for a presidential campaign in 2026 without the predominant figure of Óscar Iván Zuluaga, who has been a key voice in the party. His resignation and the legal troubles he faces have sidelined him from the race, leaving the party in a process of redefinition and searching for new leaders. The discontent that has arisen among the truckers and the internal criticism within the Historical Pact represent only a part of the challenges facing the government. Fiscal management, pressure from economic sectors, and instability in the political environment could further complicate President Petro's agenda. As these events unfold, it is clear that the decisions made at this moment are crucial. The government's response to the truckers' strike crisis and how it manages internal tensions will determine its capacity to advance its political agenda. What is at stake is not only the stability of the current government but also the future of public policies that affect millions of Colombians. The path forward seems uncertain, and the government has the responsibility to navigate these turbulent waters with skill and sensitivity. A lack of action or poorly made decisions could turn the current crisis into a turning point that leads to greater polarization and distrust in Petro's leadership. The coming days and weeks will be decisive for the direction of the administration and the public perception of its effectiveness in addressing the country's most pressing issues.